Indelible records are a cornerstone of censorship-resistant blockchains. But, unfortunately, the easier it is to alter, the easier it is to censor. For that reason, the penalties for violating privacy should be severe.
Hive approaches are: making content hard to find, shunning authors and community measures.
- Not all media is stored s con chain - image servers and video servers can stop serving images.
- A hive frontend or API server can refuse to serve specific posts or process certain transactions.
- An author can edit their Hive posts, and it is not easy to retrieve old versions. Not impossible, but difficult.
- A mass downvoted post is hidden and negatively affects the author's reputation.
- An author that attracts too many enemies might be the target of downvoting on their future posts.
- Some frontends have tools for communities to mute/hide posts and errant members. And I would like to see more in this area because community norms set what is and isn't allowed.
On the legal side, courts should consider indelibility in defamation and privacy violation cases.
I agree with you and I think very well all those possibilities that #hive gives, but there should be the possibility of denouncing content that violates the moral integrity of a person. You don't think so. Greetings
I don't know what you mean by violating the moral integrity of a person. But it doesn't matter; on Hive, you can denounce already. What's near impossible is to censor outright.
Thank you for your reply. I mean that personal information can be leaked, such as compromising images, which were obtained through a cybersecurity crime and that person publishes them. How to report and to whom. Very good debate.thanks