however, here we are running into the issue of how/why to use - and just fitting new tools into an old 'learning/teaching model,' rather than considering how might the models be upgraded in parallel given the new tools available.
i.e. the clickbaity study deducing "ChatGPT users have decreased brain function" -> that's not at all a representation of all AI users, but a small subset of students who are using it for the primary purpose of having it do their assignments for them - a means of facilitating laziness/efficient in the old model to produce what's being required to pass the school's curriculum. meanwhile, there are entirely different types of people using the same tools in completely different contexts for completely different reasons - who would probably show increased intelligence, as they're not just using it to help them 'think outside the box,' but build entirely new systems beyond the shape of a box.
thus, the educational institutions I'd give more credit to are the ones teaching students how to use AI to expand their capacities and innovate. not just for the purpose of duplicating the completion of homework to check the boxes of what a "good student" does in the old system, but that are a testament to & embodiment of a focus & intention of the starting point of "how do we use this to make ourselves smarter and not just "succeed" in the old system, but build new ones that serve in better ways than the old ever did... 😉✨