And I think that having that end date makes it easier to plan what a quality of life looks like, as it would be pretty clear what most people need to do to have a decent life up until that point. The governments will start enforcing it soon anyway - feeding the bodies of the poor to livestock.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, an end date makes the math cleaner for savings and risk, but pushing it by law is its' own dystopia.
Let people choose a planning horizon, then build policy that nudges there behavior toward health, purpose, and time with family :)
Otherwise goverments drift from caring to culling, and that dark joke stops being a joke, you know?
Would you take a voluntary 75 target with strong supports, no penalties past it?