haha yup, good question. Note that this paper differs from others in that its "findings" are just a simple statistical model that accounts for large variability in nature and quantifying bias. It's basically a thought experiment on the overall confidence of the overall scientific literature, both past and future.
haha yup, good question. Note that this paper differs from others in that its "findings" are just a simple statistical model that accounts for large variability in nature and quantifying bias. It's basically a thought experiment on the overall confidence of the overall scientific literature, both past and future.