Game Theory and Governance of Scalable Blockchains for Use in Digital Network States
Chapter 7. Sustainable Economy & Decentralized Coin Distribution

- Distribution types
- Incentivised Stake Holder Distribution (ISHD, AKA Proof of Brain (PoB))
- Social distribution as a Trojan Horse
- Distribution to multiple parties
- Ongoing distribution
- The importance of earning your tokens
- Keeping inflation in check
- What you want to see
- What you don't want to see
- Application of Semi-Centralised Models
- No compromise for free speech & censorship resistance
- "Founder" stake size / major stakeholder dominance
▶️ 3Speak
Great stuff! Just a note if you can increase the volume a bit on these videos.
Congratulations @networkstate! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 700 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out our last posts:
Transcript ⏬
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000
Chapter 7
2
00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:13,760
Chapter 7 Decentralized Coin Distribution
3
00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:21,260
So in this section we're going to talk about how to decentralize the coin, how to distribute it
4
00:00:21,260 --> 00:00:26,220
and why it's important to distribute it in a certain way such that it's decentralized.
5
00:00:26,220 --> 00:00:34,140
The problem that a lot of the current projects in blockchain do or have is that they don't have very good distribution mechanisms.
6
00:00:36,300 --> 00:00:42,100
One of the keys for example is that most distribution mechanisms are either done by DeFi
7
00:00:42,100 --> 00:00:48,020
which often results in a centralized system pulling a rug pull which is where people lose their money
8
00:00:48,020 --> 00:00:53,420
or an inflation scheme where people's funds are inflated away.
9
00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:56,200
People in blockchain are decentralized.
10
00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:56,220
People in blockchain are decentralized.
11
00:00:56,220 --> 00:01:00,280
Most of the chains can mine the currencies but mining is getting very expensive now.
12
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,140
It's becoming out of the reach of most average people.
13
00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:06,260
And the other way that you can earn the tokens is by trading for it
14
00:01:06,260 --> 00:01:10,760
but trading is very, very difficult and 90% of people lose money when they're doing it.
15
00:01:11,320 --> 00:01:16,540
And the last way of course is that you can work for a large whale or stakeholder in those tokens.
16
00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:23,940
The problem with that is that the large whales or stakeholders are unlikely to distribute currency for charity
17
00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:26,200
so they're always going to be earning more.
18
00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:30,260
They're going to be earning more value off your work anyway so as you do work for them
19
00:01:30,260 --> 00:01:38,160
maybe they pay you $50 an hour to do some work but they'll be earning $60 to $70 an hour off the work that you do
20
00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:44,720
because the ecosystems that they're building with your labor is worth more than the sum of the individual parts.
21
00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:50,260
And so it's very difficult to get social mobility if you don't decentralize the coin correctly.
22
00:01:50,780 --> 00:01:55,660
And one of the things that the ecosystem that we work on which is Hive but generally,
23
00:01:56,200 --> 00:02:02,040
DPoS or Incentivized Stakeholder Distribution as we refer it to, refer to it as,
24
00:02:03,420 --> 00:02:08,240
it has this additional distribution mechanism where as you guessed from the name,
25
00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:14,840
Incentivized Stakeholder Distribution, you can get some rewards from the ecosystem
26
00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:18,220
for doing something valuable for the community and the community can then judge you
27
00:02:18,220 --> 00:02:20,640
and decide if it was valuable or not and then they vote for you
28
00:02:20,640 --> 00:02:25,260
and some of the inflation gets distributed to the users who are doing things for the community.
29
00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:32,200
At the same time, the users are incentivized to vote for that stuff so they actually get rewards for voting
30
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:37,200
and so the stakeholders are incentivized to distribute the token
31
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:42,200
and this is a key difference between the chains that we're working on such as Hive
32
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:45,200
and most of the rest of the industry currently
33
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:49,200
in that there is this additional distribution mechanism
34
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:53,200
and that can be used as a Trojan horse to distribute the token.
35
00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:55,200
So I'll stop here for a second and just pass it over to David.
36
00:02:56,200 --> 00:03:01,200
We want to talk about distribution types, incentivized stakeholder distribution,
37
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:05,200
social distributions as a Trojan horse, distribution to multiple parties,
38
00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:08,200
ongoing distribution, the importance of earning your tokens
39
00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:12,200
and this is the key word is earning your tokens, not buying your tokens.
40
00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:16,200
Keeping inflation in check, what you want to see, what you don't want to see,
41
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:21,200
application of semi-centralized models, no compromise of free speech and censorship resistance
42
00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:25,200
and founder stake size or major stakeholder dominance.
43
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:26,200
I'm going to stop there.
44
00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:28,200
I'm not expecting Dan to remember all of that.
45
00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:30,200
I don't know if you want to take the phone
46
00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:34,200
and just go through it when you're done with one section.
47
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:36,200
But I'm just going to pass it over.
48
00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:45,200
So to create a network effect.
49
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:53,200
So you did distribution types.
50
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:57,200
So incentivize stakeholder distribution.
51
00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:04,200
Talk about distribution types first, if you can think of any.
52
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:09,200
Well, I mean, the distribution types that currently exist are from mining
53
00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:14,200
or being a validator, sort of the same thing.
54
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:21,200
You can get it from a layer one DAO, which is basically you propose work,
55
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:25,200
people vote on that and you can get funded that way.
56
00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:29,200
And then there's also obviously trading.
57
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:33,200
People can sell their tokens.
58
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:37,200
But it's very difficult to actually think of distribution models
59
00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:41,200
and distribution mechanisms that work beyond those.
60
00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:47,200
We have things where you can earn to provide infrastructure.
61
00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:50,200
It's basically summed up as a value for value model,
62
00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:54,200
where you provide some sort of value and you can earn value in return.
63
00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:56,200
And that's really the fourth.
64
00:04:56,200 --> 00:05:03,200
And it's a new way of doing it because you have to solve the problem of,
65
00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:09,200
I have something valuable, yet it should be distributed.
66
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:12,200
But if something's valuable, most people are going to keep it.
67
00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:17,200
So you have to figure a way where they're actually incentivized
68
00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:19,200
to distribute and grow the network effect
69
00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:20,200
instead of the distribution.
70
00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:22,200
Instead of keeping it for themselves.
71
00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:27,200
And that's a very hard problem that's really sort of age old.
72
00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:34,200
And you do it by making sure all incentives are aligned.
73
00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:36,200
And when you have people who are actually incentivized
74
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:42,200
to grow the network, you have a way to, it's sort of like a faucet.
75
00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,200
Because they're incentivized, yes,
76
00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:49,200
but there also needs to be value on the other end.
77
00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:52,200
And it's sort of up for grabs.
78
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:56,200
Whoever wants to provide the most value can earn the most.
79
00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:59,200
So anyone can get in.
80
00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:03,200
You don't have to worry about where you're from
81
00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:08,200
or any discrimination or anything of that sort.
82
00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,200
You can earn if you provide value.
83
00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:14,200
And you don't even have to provide an ID.
84
00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:18,200
So these are the ways that I think that last point
85
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:22,200
is the most efficient way and one of the strongest points
86
00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:26,200
when it comes to actually growing a network effect.
87
00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:30,200
The most obvious is the validators, the miners.
88
00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,200
That's the most important.
89
00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:35,200
Because without that, nothing works.
90
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:40,200
But at the same time, to decentralize that process,
91
00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,200
you need a great network effect.
92
00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:47,200
So you have to have a way to not just pay the miners.
93
00:06:47,200 --> 00:06:50,200
You need to think outside the box.
94
00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:54,200
All distribution mechanisms are on the table.
95
00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:59,200
So when it comes to my favorite, incentivized stakeholder distribution,
96
00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:04,200
value for value model, you see all kinds of things pop up
97
00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:09,200
because now you also have social reputation.
98
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:15,200
And when you align those two, people will now grow the network effect
99
00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,200
but in a valuable way.
100
00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:22,200
Because with trading, people are just looking to sell and dump.
101
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:25,200
But when it comes to actual value for value model,
102
00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,200
people have proven that they want to provide value.
103
00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:29,200
They've improved the network.
104
00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,200
Therefore, now they have stake in the network.
105
00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:36,200
So if we're talking the most powerful when it comes to growing this,
106
00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,200
it is the value for value model,
107
00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:41,200
the incentivized stakeholder distribution model.
108
00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:45,200
Even validators, when they earn, they usually sell some
109
00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:47,200
to keep the cost going.
110
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:51,200
Especially when it comes to proof of work.
111
00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:56,200
So it's very important that you are distributing far and wide.
112
00:07:56,200 --> 00:08:03,200
And it's a Red Queen game in terms of keeping up with the validators.
113
00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:06,200
You don't want a group earning more than the others.
114
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:10,200
You want to give everyone a fair opportunity to earn
115
00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:13,200
by doing something valuable for the network.
116
00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:16,200
That should be the end goal if we're talking game theory here.
117
00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:18,200
How do we grow the network,
118
00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:22,200
but also find a way for people to buy value outside of technology
119
00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:25,200
or being a validator?
120
00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:30,200
There's a lot more that goes into making a chain censorship resistance
121
00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:32,200
than just coding.
122
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,200
It takes a lot more than that.
123
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:36,200
So finding ways to incentivize that,
124
00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:39,200
you have to put it in the person's hands.
125
00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:41,200
I like to think each person is a DAO
126
00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:45,200
because they decide a tiny bit of where the inflation goes
127
00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:47,200
based on where they see the value
128
00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,200
and people see the world differently.
129
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:53,200
So it's a very diverse, strong way to do it.
130
00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:00,200
The only thing that I'd add to that is that,
131
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:05,200
just to say the incentivized stakeholder distribution model
132
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:09,200
originally started off on Steam as something called proof of brain
133
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:13,200
where it was 75% of the rewards went to the content creator,
134
00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:15,200
I.e. the person who supposedly took it.
135
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,200
It's creating value for the ecosystem
136
00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:20,200
and documenting it via blogs.
137
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:25,200
And then 25% of the reward went to the curator of that,
138
00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:27,200
to the person who found the content and voted it
139
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,200
and the people that did that,
140
00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:34,200
with the idea being that the content is more valuable than the curation.
141
00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:36,200
The problem is that historically,
142
00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:39,200
and this is one of the hoops that I've had to jump through
143
00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:43,200
to get to where it is without really being able to pre-plan this,
144
00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:45,200
is that what that resulted in,
145
00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,200
with the 75% for the content creator
146
00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:52,200
and 25% for the content curator,
147
00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:57,200
resulted in bid bots where people would sell their votes, basically.
148
00:09:57,200 --> 00:10:02,200
And this is just effectively a value extraction from the chain
149
00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:08,200
where the people who bid the most for the votes got voted.
150
00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:12,200
So effectively what happened was the stakeholders with the big accounts,
151
00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:14,200
or some of them,
152
00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:19,200
were able to direct people to pay them
153
00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:21,200
and then they would vote.
154
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:25,200
And then they would be able to earn more from their upvote
155
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:28,200
because their vote didn't really get that much
156
00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:31,200
if they're just doing pure curation at 25%.
157
00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:35,200
So the chain eventually changed to 50-50 rewards
158
00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:38,200
where it's 50% goes to the content creators
159
00:10:38,200 --> 00:10:41,200
and 50% goes to the content curators.
160
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:42,200
And so,
161
00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:44,200
and that eliminated bid bots.
162
00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:46,200
And that was a very controversial period
163
00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:51,200
and it was a very counter-intuitive change that was happening
164
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:53,200
because the intuitive thing is to think
165
00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:56,200
that the content's worth more than the vote.
166
00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:58,200
But when you do that, you get bid bots,
167
00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:00,200
which are an extraction from the system.
168
00:11:00,200 --> 00:11:02,200
And the counter-intuitive thing is to think
169
00:11:02,200 --> 00:11:06,200
that the vote is worth the same as the content.
170
00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:11,200
And that is effectively saying that the stakeholder,
171
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:13,200
the incentivization of the stakeholder,
172
00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:17,200
is as important as the incentivization of the content creator.
173
00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:21,200
And that creates a balanced system and eliminates bid bots
174
00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:24,200
because it just takes away the edge that a bid bot would have
175
00:11:24,200 --> 00:11:27,200
if everyone's getting equal rewards
176
00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:29,200
in terms of percentage rewards.
177
00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:32,200
Of course, everyone isn't getting equal rewards across the whole system
178
00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:34,200
because if you get voted more,
179
00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:37,200
then you receive more of the inflation.
180
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:39,200
And the vote has to be done based on
181
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:41,200
a stake-weighted vote,
182
00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:45,200
so people with more stakes in the ecosystem,
183
00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:47,200
the people who have staked in for the longest
184
00:11:47,200 --> 00:11:50,200
and with the biggest accounts staked,
185
00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:53,200
they have more influence over the inflation
186
00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,200
and where it goes than the people with the smaller accounts.
187
00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:58,200
So it's not one account, one vote,
188
00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:00,200
it's one token, one vote,
189
00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:03,200
or coin voting in this case.
190
00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:06,200
But the key is that they have to have
191
00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:08,200
an equal incentive for the voter
192
00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:11,200
as for the content creator or the value.
193
00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:20,200
Just to touch on social distribution as a Trojan horse,
194
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:23,200
so these ecosystems have traditionally all started
195
00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:25,200
as social media ecosystems
196
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:28,200
because with the idea being that people can curate content,
197
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:31,200
people can make content,
198
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,200
traditionally it was done as just pure blogging.
199
00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:38,200
And as time's gone on, it's slowly but surely moving,
200
00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:40,200
which I think is important,
201
00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:42,200
to documenting value creation
202
00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:44,200
for the ecosystem, for the community,
203
00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:46,200
rather than just here's my lunch
204
00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:48,200
or here's what I did today in my blog.
205
00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:50,200
It should move more towards
206
00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:52,200
here's what I did for the community today,
207
00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:54,200
here's the value I created for the community today,
208
00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:56,200
please upvote me and support me in what I'm doing
209
00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:58,200
to help it grow.
210
00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,200
That's where we want to take it
211
00:13:00,200 --> 00:13:02,200
and it's slowly but surely moving that way.
212
00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:05,200
Now all of this kind of social interaction,
213
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:07,200
you can get rewarded for your comments,
214
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:09,200
you can get rewarded for your blogs,
215
00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:12,200
you can get rewarded for running infrastructure
216
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,200
in the ecosystem or for being a witness,
217
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,200
which is one of the top 20 validators.
218
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:20,200
So there's various different ways
219
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:22,200
you can be rewarded in the ecosystem.
220
00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:25,200
The idea is particularly with the content,
221
00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:28,200
it was a Trojan horse because everyone can create content
222
00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:30,200
or more or less everyone can
223
00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:34,200
and everyone can almost certainly curate.
224
00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:38,200
So this is a way for people to earn passively or actively
225
00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:43,200
whilst doing relatively simple activities.
226
00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:47,200
And so it creates this distribution of the token
227
00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:52,200
where the community doesn't really realize what it's doing.
228
00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:54,200
The community is just creating content to get rewards,
229
00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:56,200
but what's happening behind the scenes
230
00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:58,200
is that the token is getting distributed
231
00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:00,200
and it's getting distributed far and wide
232
00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:02,200
because so many different people can create
233
00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:03,200
so many different types of content
234
00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:05,200
and create so many different types of value for the community
235
00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:07,200
and they can curate.
236
00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:09,200
So with this type of ecosystem,
237
00:14:09,200 --> 00:14:12,200
with an incentivized stakeholder distribution model
238
00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:14,200
and a parametered coin voting model,
239
00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:16,200
otherwise known as DPoS,
240
00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:18,200
Delegated Proof of Stake,
241
00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:21,200
it's important that you distribute the token far and wide
242
00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:24,200
in multiple different nations and countries
243
00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,200
because if one country decides to shut the token down,
244
00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:29,200
they may well achieve that in one country.
245
00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:32,200
But if the token is distributed across the whole world,
246
00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,200
it's really difficult to shut it down
247
00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:36,200
in all jurisdictions at the same time.
248
00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:39,200
And this is important because it means
249
00:14:39,200 --> 00:14:41,200
that every time you vote,
250
00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:43,200
you are distributing the token
251
00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:46,200
and it's a Trojan horse to actually secure the chain
252
00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:48,200
and reward the users at the same time.
253
00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:50,200
And those rewards also correlate
254
00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:52,200
to governance votes in the ecosystem
255
00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:54,200
or voting rights in the ecosystem.
256
00:14:54,200 --> 00:14:56,200
So the more value you create for the community,
257
00:14:56,200 --> 00:14:58,200
the more governance rights you get,
258
00:14:58,200 --> 00:15:00,200
the more you're distributing the token,
259
00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:03,200
the more secure the chain becomes.
260
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:05,200
I don't know if you've got any other thoughts
261
00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:08,200
on social distribution as a Trojan horse, then?
262
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:14,200
Or do you want to talk about distributing to multiple parties?
263
00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:18,200
Yeah, distributing to multiple parties.
264
00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:24,200
Yeah, well, I've touched on that a bit.
265
00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:26,200
You can't have one.
266
00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:29,200
The whole point is we have to come to an agreement
267
00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:33,200
on how something is done.
268
00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:35,200
And you can't just think of,
269
00:15:35,200 --> 00:15:37,200
you know, current distribution.
270
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:39,200
You have to think of future distribution.
271
00:15:39,200 --> 00:15:41,200
And if you have no future distribution,
272
00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:45,200
then that means whoever's here is ordained, sort of.
273
00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:47,200
No one else can earn.
274
00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:49,200
It has to be bought
275
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:52,200
or earned in various ways from other stakeholders,
276
00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:55,200
but not just from the protocol itself.
277
00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:58,200
If you have one distribution mechanism
278
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,200
where it's only going to validators, for example,
279
00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:03,200
well, now everyone else has to buy
280
00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:05,200
to keep up with the validators.
281
00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:08,200
So it creates centralization over time
282
00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:10,200
because one group of parties is earning
283
00:16:10,200 --> 00:16:12,200
where everyone else has to buy.
284
00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:17,200
Now, the idea is to get as many distribution mechanisms
285
00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:21,200
as you possibly can and in different forms.
286
00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:23,200
So you have validators,
287
00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:26,200
and then you want ways to earn everything.
288
00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:28,200
Any way you can think of,
289
00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:30,200
the more the better.
290
00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:34,200
Yeah, just value for value models.
291
00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:38,200
There's really a value for value model that's a tree,
292
00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:40,200
and there's a bunch of branches
293
00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:42,200
that can grow various different ways,
294
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:44,200
like infrastructure providing or marketing.
295
00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:46,200
You name it.
296
00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:48,200
And then there's the validator route
297
00:16:48,200 --> 00:16:51,200
where if you're a validator, you can earn.
298
00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:54,200
That one's what most people are familiar with.
299
00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:56,200
And then you have DAO.
300
00:16:56,200 --> 00:16:58,200
It has to be on a base layer,
301
00:16:58,200 --> 00:17:01,200
but where you can actually earn from the protocol
302
00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:04,200
based off votes, based off governance votes.
303
00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:07,200
So community projects,
304
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:09,200
this is where some of your core developers,
305
00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,200
your community projects, your nonprofits,
306
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:14,200
all these things come from.
307
00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:16,200
The community is basically,
308
00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:18,200
it's like a giant,
309
00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:20,200
you have incentive by state cultural distribution,
310
00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:23,200
and this one's like a giant focus one
311
00:17:23,200 --> 00:17:24,200
that the community gets.
312
00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:26,200
It's like one vote for the community.
313
00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:28,200
So if we see a project we like
314
00:17:28,200 --> 00:17:30,200
that requires more funding
315
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:33,200
than we're able to give as an individual,
316
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:34,200
we all say,
317
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:37,200
well, we're able to lend a little bit each,
318
00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:39,200
basically via dilution.
319
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:41,200
Sort of like a spirit bomb,
320
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:43,200
if you're familiar with Dragon Ball Z.
321
00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:45,200
Everyone puts up a little bit,
322
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:48,200
and then you focus that onto whatever you want to vote on.
323
00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:50,200
And that's a powerful way
324
00:17:50,200 --> 00:17:53,200
because now you're thinking outside of just validators,
325
00:17:53,200 --> 00:17:55,200
and then you have your value for value model,
326
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:59,200
which unlocks all kinds of various different ways.
327
00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:03,200
So yeah, the idea is to always have
328
00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:05,200
multiple distribution mechanisms.
329
00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:07,200
Ultimately at the end of the day,
330
00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:10,200
you have something like proof of work,
331
00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:12,200
and then you have coin voting.
332
00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:14,200
Coin voting is all this time.
333
00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:16,200
So it's good to perfect it
334
00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:19,200
and at least have it as a legitimate route
335
00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:22,200
because we need as many governance models
336
00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:24,200
proven and tested as possible.
337
00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:26,200
So the only way coin distribution
338
00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:28,200
or coin voting actually works
339
00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:30,200
is if the coin distribution is decentralized.
340
00:18:30,200 --> 00:18:32,200
And just because it's decentralized now
341
00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:35,200
doesn't mean in the future it won't become centralized.
342
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:37,200
That is why you always have to be thinking
343
00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:39,200
of future distribution.
344
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:49,200
Yeah, don't worry.
345
00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:51,200
There's not a war going on outside.
346
00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:53,200
It's just any Friday in Mexico,
347
00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:55,200
it's fireworks.
348
00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:57,200
All right.
349
00:18:57,200 --> 00:19:02,200
No, I think we can get through this chapter.
350
00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:03,200
Hold on.
351
00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:05,200
Distribution to multiple parties.
352
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:07,200
Ongoing distribution.
353
00:19:07,200 --> 00:19:09,200
The importance of earning your tokens.
354
00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:14,200
So the key thing here is that many projects in crypto
355
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:16,200
have ordained themselves tokens.
356
00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:20,200
Some have given themselves 80% pre-mines
357
00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:22,200
before the token got released.
358
00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:25,200
And they say, oh, we have to use it to fund our own projects
359
00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:26,200
or we have to lock it up
360
00:19:26,200 --> 00:19:28,200
to distribute it later.
361
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:34,200
But ultimately, the founders and the CEOs of these ecosystems
362
00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:37,200
have control over these pre-mined supplies.
363
00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:40,200
And it centralizes control of the ecosystem.
364
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:44,200
It also results in the communities openly being used
365
00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:49,200
as exit liquidity by the founders of these ecosystems.
366
00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:54,200
So it's an immoral model under the guise of self-funding.
367
00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,200
How do we fund ourselves?
368
00:19:56,200 --> 00:19:59,200
If we can't have a portion of the tokens to ourselves
369
00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:01,200
to keep the project going?
370
00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:03,200
Well, Bitcoin never did that.
371
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:06,200
The idea is you build the technology open source and free
372
00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:09,200
and then you release it to the community
373
00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:11,200
without giving yourself any tokens.
374
00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:14,200
And then you have to go in the ecosystem with everyone else
375
00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:18,200
and earn the tokens fair and square like everyone else did.
376
00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:21,200
That's very difficult to do because people need to eat.
377
00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:23,200
People need to self-sustain
378
00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:25,200
when they're building these projects.
379
00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:27,200
So it's very, very difficult.
380
00:20:27,200 --> 00:20:28,200
But there's multiple ways.
381
00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:29,200
We'll go into a bit later in the book
382
00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:34,200
on how to fund these projects in a decentralized way
383
00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:36,200
rather than giving yourself any of the token
384
00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:39,200
when you start if you're a founder.
385
00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:42,200
And that also gives the government the moral right
386
00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:45,200
to regulate you because you're using your community members
387
00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:48,200
unsuspectingly as exit liquidity.
388
00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:50,200
So the importance in these ecosystems
389
00:20:50,200 --> 00:20:52,200
is that you can earn the token.
390
00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:54,200
You can flat out earn the token separately
391
00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:56,200
by doing good things for the community,
392
00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:58,200
receiving votes from the community,
393
00:20:58,200 --> 00:21:02,200
and the community will, by voting for you,
394
00:21:02,200 --> 00:21:04,200
distribute the inflation to you.
395
00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:07,200
So now you're earning the token instead of buying the token
396
00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:10,200
or distributing the token to yourself if you're a founder.
397
00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:13,200
And what it does is it means if the founders are really good
398
00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:15,200
and the community likes the founders,
399
00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:17,200
then they'll keep voting for the founders
400
00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:18,200
when they publish content.
401
00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:21,200
And so the founders will earn their stake in the ecosystem
402
00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:23,200
instead of mining it
403
00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:26,200
or although if it's a fair, legitimate mining model,
404
00:21:26,200 --> 00:21:29,200
that's also fine
405
00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,200
where it's on an equal playing field.
406
00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:33,200
But if you get the tokens early,
407
00:21:33,200 --> 00:21:38,200
like 20%, 40%, 60% of the tokens in your pocket early,
408
00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:39,200
ordained by yourself,
409
00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:42,200
then ultimately that's the definition of a security.
410
00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:44,200
And it's an unregistered security often,
411
00:21:44,200 --> 00:21:47,200
and so now the government's got the right to regulate you.
412
00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:48,200
And then on top of that,
413
00:21:48,200 --> 00:21:50,200
most of these projects are registered
414
00:21:50,200 --> 00:21:52,200
in pro-regulation jurisdictions.
415
00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:55,200
As companies or the CEOs of these companies,
416
00:21:55,200 --> 00:21:56,200
everyone knows their phone numbers,
417
00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:59,200
everyone knows where to go.
418
00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:02,200
So this is a huge problem.
419
00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:05,200
So the importance here is whenever you look
420
00:22:05,200 --> 00:22:06,200
at a decentralized ecosystem,
421
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,200
one of the questions you should be asking yourself is,
422
00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:11,200
can you earn the token?
423
00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:14,200
If you can earn the token by doing things for the community,
424
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:17,200
then it's got a chance of being actually decentralized
425
00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:20,200
and it's got a chance of at least moving away
426
00:22:20,200 --> 00:22:21,200
from the founders
427
00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:25,200
and the CEO or the company that started the token.
428
00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:28,200
Hopefully there's no company or CEO at all
429
00:22:28,200 --> 00:22:30,200
in the ecosystems that you're using.
430
00:22:30,200 --> 00:22:33,200
And then there's always a way to earn the token fair and square
431
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:35,200
like everyone else can.
432
00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:36,200
And that's the key.
433
00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:39,200
And if the founders have to earn their token as well,
434
00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:41,200
it's a pretty big deal.
435
00:22:41,200 --> 00:22:43,200
It really makes it a fair distribution.
436
00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:48,200
It's one of the key elements that we've identified.
437
00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:50,200
Keeping inflation in check is another thing.
438
00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:59,200
So you have to have an agreed consensus inflation model.
439
00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:02,200
In the token systems that we're talking about,
440
00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:04,200
the inflation is continuous.
441
00:23:04,200 --> 00:23:07,200
It doesn't cap off like Bitcoin does.
442
00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:13,200
The reason for that is because you have to have an incentive layer
443
00:23:13,200 --> 00:23:16,200
to reward the infrastructure operators,
444
00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:19,200
but also so that people can earn the token and stake it
445
00:23:19,200 --> 00:23:22,200
so they can get access to the rewards competition,
446
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:26,200
sorry, to the resource competition on the base layer.
447
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:28,200
So if people can't earn the token,
448
00:23:28,200 --> 00:23:33,200
they can't stake tokens to get access to resources.
449
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:37,200
Yes, you need to see a continuing inflation in these tokens,
450
00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:41,200
but it should be very, very, very low, as low as possible.
451
00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:43,200
It can start off on some projects,
452
00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:47,200
it can start off high in the kind of 15% range per annum
453
00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:49,200
and then drop slowly every year.
454
00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:53,200
Down to a level such as 0.5% a year.
455
00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:56,200
And that should be enough just to keep the system greased
456
00:23:56,200 --> 00:23:58,200
and incentivized.
457
00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:00,200
Now, everyone in blockchain will say,
458
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:03,200
oh, this is bad because we need to cap the token like Bitcoin
459
00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:05,200
so we stop inflation.
460
00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:08,200
But the argument is as long as a community is producing
461
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:11,200
more economic value than the inflation is worth,
462
00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,200
it should maintain a sustainable token price.
463
00:24:15,200 --> 00:24:18,200
And as long as the community is not going to act in its,
464
00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:21,200
as long as the community acts in its own best interests,
465
00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:23,200
then it makes sense that it will not vote
466
00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:26,200
for inflationary policies like governments do.
467
00:24:26,200 --> 00:24:29,200
And so we believe that you can have some inflation to these tokens,
468
00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:31,200
but minimal and under control
469
00:24:31,200 --> 00:24:34,200
and agreed in consensus by the community.
470
00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:42,200
So what you want to see, any thoughts on that, Dan?
471
00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:48,200
Yeah, all right.
472
00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:51,200
We'll cut it here and we'll come back on the distribution section
473
00:24:51,200 --> 00:24:55,200
in another recording.
474
00:24:55,200 --> 00:24:57,200
All right.
475
00:25:03,200 --> 00:25:07,200
This is chapter 7.2.
476
00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:10,200
We're going to talk about what you want to see
477
00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:12,200
and what you don't want to see.
478
00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:15,200
As these distributions unfold.
479
00:25:15,200 --> 00:25:17,200
Any thoughts on this, Dan?
480
00:25:21,200 --> 00:25:25,200
You don't want to see any kind of ICO or sale or pre-mine
481
00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:29,200
or unfair advantage of the coin.
482
00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:33,200
What you want to see is an open opportunity,
483
00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:38,200
no barriers, meaning it can't cost a lot of money or resources.
484
00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:41,200
People must be able to provide value.
485
00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,200
In exchange for the coin.
486
00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:48,200
It has to be seen as not that valuable at the beginning,
487
00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:50,200
which is hard to do nowadays.
488
00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:53,200
But there has to be a reason to just distribute it and give it away.
489
00:25:53,200 --> 00:25:56,200
If you think of the 10,000 Bitcoin pizza.
490
00:25:56,200 --> 00:26:00,200
So you don't want a highly desirable coin before it's even launched
491
00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:03,200
because then the VCs will eat it up.
492
00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:08,200
You don't want to see any kind of founder ego
493
00:26:08,200 --> 00:26:10,200
who
494
00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:12,200
gets a cult-like following,
495
00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:15,200
even if he doesn't have that strong of a distribution.
496
00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:20,200
People can tend to just listen to go with just the founder.
497
00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:24,200
So, you know, it's obviously the best way is founderless.
498
00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,200
If not, you have a founder who takes a back seat.
499
00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:34,200
It's good to see
500
00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:38,200
ways that people in all kinds of countries,
501
00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:39,200
especially where it's needed,
502
00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:44,200
can get involved
503
00:26:44,200 --> 00:26:47,200
without having to ask for permission.
504
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:51,200
So permissionless entry.
505
00:26:51,200 --> 00:26:54,200
You definitely don't want the only thing,
506
00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:57,200
only way to get the coin is selling,
507
00:26:57,200 --> 00:27:01,200
even if you didn't have the pre-mine.
508
00:27:09,200 --> 00:27:15,200
The other things that I would not want to see
509
00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:20,200
is a situation where there's a growing upper class
510
00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:22,200
and a growing lower class,
511
00:27:22,200 --> 00:27:24,200
but not a growing middle class.
512
00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:27,200
You really need to have middle classes.
513
00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:29,200
And the way the middle classes happen,
514
00:27:29,200 --> 00:27:30,200
in our view,
515
00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:34,200
is the lower classes have to create value,
516
00:27:34,200 --> 00:27:36,200
like added value activities,
517
00:27:36,200 --> 00:27:38,200
such as providing a service,
518
00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:39,200
a digital service,
519
00:27:39,200 --> 00:27:41,200
or creating events,
520
00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:44,200
or marketing a community,
521
00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:46,200
anything around the community
522
00:27:46,200 --> 00:27:50,200
to kind of feed value back into the community.
523
00:27:50,200 --> 00:27:53,200
And these added value services
524
00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:54,200
can be used to make money
525
00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:57,200
and be used to garner more upvotes from the community
526
00:27:57,200 --> 00:28:00,200
to distribute more inflation to those activities.
527
00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:05,200
And that can then move those users up the social scale
528
00:28:05,200 --> 00:28:07,200
to the middle class.
529
00:28:07,200 --> 00:28:09,200
And then once you've got a burgeoning middle class,
530
00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:11,200
that middle class can be way more eyes and ears
531
00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:13,200
to distribute way more tokens
532
00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:15,200
to different pieces of content.
533
00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:18,200
If you just have whales and plankton,
534
00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:20,200
or upper class and lower class,
535
00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:22,200
then those whales often struggle
536
00:28:22,200 --> 00:28:24,200
to distribute the token to everyone.
537
00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:27,200
So you really need to keep a check and balance
538
00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:29,200
as you go on,
539
00:28:29,200 --> 00:28:32,200
and this is by reading the chain,
540
00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:34,200
you have to watch your middle class
541
00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:36,200
and make sure it's growing.
542
00:28:36,200 --> 00:28:38,200
Make sure there's social mobility
543
00:28:38,200 --> 00:28:40,200
so that plankton become,
544
00:28:40,200 --> 00:28:42,200
dolphins become,
545
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:45,200
orcas become whales.
546
00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:48,200
Or at least you see some signs of that being possible.
547
00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,200
And the other thing you don't want to see
548
00:28:50,200 --> 00:28:55,200
is all the tokens accumulating around just a few whales.
549
00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:56,200
If you see that,
550
00:28:56,200 --> 00:29:00,200
then either your social activity
551
00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:04,200
isn't strong enough or isn't high enough volume,
552
00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:06,200
or your distribution model
553
00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:08,200
isn't good enough,
554
00:29:08,200 --> 00:29:10,200
or you don't have the right token,
555
00:29:10,200 --> 00:29:12,200
and it's not the correct settings.
556
00:29:12,200 --> 00:29:14,200
You've got to tweak it more to get,
557
00:29:14,200 --> 00:29:16,200
well, you've got to get the community to agree,
558
00:29:16,200 --> 00:29:18,200
including those whales,
559
00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:20,200
to tweak it more to distribute the token
560
00:29:20,200 --> 00:29:21,200
to the lower class
561
00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:24,200
and turn them into middle class members.
562
00:29:24,200 --> 00:29:27,200
The theory is that it's in the interest of those whales
563
00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:28,200
to vote for that,
564
00:29:28,200 --> 00:29:31,200
because if they take all the tokens to themselves,
565
00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:32,200
then eventually,
566
00:29:32,200 --> 00:29:34,200
if all the tokens pool in the hands of the whales,
567
00:29:34,200 --> 00:29:36,200
they risk being forked out,
568
00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:37,200
the lower class leaving.
569
00:29:37,200 --> 00:29:39,200
And it's really the beauty of these systems
570
00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:40,200
is that it's the lower class,
571
00:29:40,200 --> 00:29:44,200
it's the community that provide the ultimate value
572
00:29:44,200 --> 00:29:45,200
to these tokens.
573
00:29:45,200 --> 00:29:46,200
So the whales can be rich,
574
00:29:46,200 --> 00:29:48,200
but if they don't respect
575
00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:52,200
and work out clever ways to distribute the token
576
00:29:52,200 --> 00:29:54,200
as much as possible to the lower classes,
577
00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:56,200
then the lower classes can just leave
578
00:29:56,200 --> 00:29:59,200
and go to another place without those whales.
579
00:29:59,200 --> 00:30:02,200
So they have to keep an eye on that.
580
00:30:06,200 --> 00:30:12,200
Yeah, in terms of what do and don't you want to see,
581
00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,200
I think that's the majority of it.
582
00:30:15,200 --> 00:30:19,200
Let's move on to another item here.
583
00:30:27,200 --> 00:30:30,200
The application of semi-centralized models.
584
00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:34,200
So there is a justification to do a pre-mining ICO.
585
00:30:34,200 --> 00:30:36,200
If you,
586
00:30:36,200 --> 00:30:39,200
if what you're doing is like reviewing restaurants
587
00:30:39,200 --> 00:30:44,200
or just something that's not going to rock the boat too much,
588
00:30:44,200 --> 00:30:46,200
something that isn't really related to human rights
589
00:30:46,200 --> 00:30:49,200
or digital human rights on the base layer.
590
00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:50,200
So for example,
591
00:30:50,200 --> 00:30:52,200
if you're doing restaurant reviews,
592
00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:54,200
you could have the most amazing restaurant review system
593
00:30:54,200 --> 00:30:55,200
in history.
594
00:30:55,200 --> 00:30:58,200
It's not really going to rock the boat
595
00:30:58,200 --> 00:31:00,200
of the restaurant industry too much
596
00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:02,200
or the world, the system.
597
00:31:02,200 --> 00:31:04,200
So you could get away with doing an ICO
598
00:31:04,200 --> 00:31:06,200
in that type of system.
599
00:31:06,200 --> 00:31:08,200
When you're talking about preserving free speech
600
00:31:08,200 --> 00:31:12,200
and you're talking about preserving digital human rights
601
00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:14,200
on the chain,
602
00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:17,200
then you really need to have a free, fair,
603
00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:19,200
open distribution
604
00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:23,200
where there was no CEO, no ICO, no company, no pre-mine,
605
00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:25,200
none of that type of stuff
606
00:31:25,200 --> 00:31:27,200
at the start of the project.
607
00:31:34,200 --> 00:31:35,200
Yeah, so ultimately,
608
00:31:35,200 --> 00:31:37,200
you need to decide if you're trying to preserve
609
00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:38,200
digital human rights or not.
610
00:31:38,200 --> 00:31:39,200
And if you are,
611
00:31:39,200 --> 00:31:44,200
then you need to have no compromises on
612
00:31:44,200 --> 00:31:47,200
any type of centralization in the initial distribution.
613
00:31:47,200 --> 00:31:48,200
Whereas if you're just doing something simple
614
00:31:48,200 --> 00:31:50,200
like restaurant reviews
615
00:31:50,200 --> 00:31:53,200
or some other simple activity,
616
00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:55,200
then you can get away with some form of centralization
617
00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:57,200
because no one's going to come and regulate you
618
00:31:57,200 --> 00:32:00,200
because you're not going to rock the boat.
619
00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:03,200
You're not trying to preserve human rights.
620
00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:04,200
People, of course,
621
00:32:04,200 --> 00:32:06,200
don't understand this in the ecosystem these days,
622
00:32:06,200 --> 00:32:12,200
but these are important points to understand.
623
00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:14,200
And again, just to reiterate,
624
00:32:14,200 --> 00:32:15,200
if you are trying to preserve free speech
625
00:32:15,200 --> 00:32:17,200
and censorship resistance,
626
00:32:17,200 --> 00:32:21,200
then you cannot compromise on any of these factors,
627
00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:22,200
either previously in this book
628
00:32:22,200 --> 00:32:26,200
or the preceding chapters.
629
00:32:26,200 --> 00:32:29,200
It's incredibly important that the models that we use,
630
00:32:29,200 --> 00:32:30,200
the ecosystems that we use,
631
00:32:30,200 --> 00:32:33,200
have these factors that we've described in place
632
00:32:33,200 --> 00:32:36,200
because it means you end up with a neutral layer one
633
00:32:36,200 --> 00:32:39,200
and no one can regulate a neutral,
634
00:32:39,200 --> 00:32:44,200
ownerless, unregistered,
635
00:32:44,200 --> 00:32:48,200
non-traceable to any individual layer one
636
00:32:48,200 --> 00:32:51,200
that is operating in the ways that we've described.
637
00:32:51,200 --> 00:32:52,200
If you have that,
638
00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:54,200
then you have digital human rights.
639
00:32:54,200 --> 00:32:57,200
You have censorship resistance on the layer one
640
00:32:57,200 --> 00:32:59,200
and it can't be shut down.
641
00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:00,200
And that is the key here,
642
00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:01,200
that the layer one is a neutral,
643
00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:03,200
ownerless layer one
644
00:33:03,200 --> 00:33:05,200
with no central points of failure,
645
00:33:05,200 --> 00:33:07,200
no central party behind it.
646
00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:08,200
And so as a result,
647
00:33:08,200 --> 00:33:10,200
it does then preserve free speech.
648
00:33:10,200 --> 00:33:17,200
It does then create censorship resistance.
649
00:33:17,200 --> 00:33:18,200
Any other thoughts on that, Dan,
650
00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:24,200
before we touch on stakeholder size and founder size?
651
00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:26,200
Do you want to talk about the size of stakeholders
652
00:33:26,200 --> 00:33:28,200
and the size of...
653
00:33:28,200 --> 00:33:30,200
Well, I mean, you're a large stakeholder on high,
654
00:33:30,200 --> 00:33:32,200
so maybe you can describe why you're a large stakeholder
655
00:33:32,200 --> 00:33:34,200
and why you don't want to get any bigger.
656
00:33:38,200 --> 00:33:42,200
So a very wise stakeholder
657
00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:45,200
who does not want to have responsibility
658
00:33:45,200 --> 00:33:46,200
or become an attack vector
659
00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:50,200
will realize that stake matters in coin voting.
660
00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:54,200
So it's not desirable to accumulate
661
00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:56,200
a centralizing amount
662
00:33:56,200 --> 00:34:00,200
because the community that you are
663
00:34:02,200 --> 00:34:04,200
basically buying the coin from
664
00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:06,200
will start to resent you if you get too large,
665
00:34:06,200 --> 00:34:09,200
if your influence becomes too big.
666
00:34:09,200 --> 00:34:10,200
Even if you're benevolent,
667
00:34:10,200 --> 00:34:13,200
you're going to take on risk and attack vectors
668
00:34:13,200 --> 00:34:15,200
and you'll be risked being forked out
669
00:34:15,200 --> 00:34:18,200
because you might be forced
670
00:34:18,200 --> 00:34:20,200
by an outside entity to do something
671
00:34:20,200 --> 00:34:23,200
that goes against what the community wants.
672
00:34:23,200 --> 00:34:28,200
So ideally, you never get to that point.
673
00:34:28,200 --> 00:34:30,200
You make the coin incredibly distributed
674
00:34:30,200 --> 00:34:34,200
and you make it very hard to accumulate that amount.
675
00:34:34,200 --> 00:34:37,200
That's why you can't start with any pre-mines
676
00:34:37,200 --> 00:34:42,200
or ICO sales of coins to insiders.
677
00:34:42,200 --> 00:34:46,200
But if you do have a very large stake size,
678
00:34:46,200 --> 00:34:48,200
just know that you are now...
679
00:34:48,200 --> 00:34:49,200
The larger the stake size,
680
00:34:49,200 --> 00:34:51,200
the larger target you become,
681
00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:55,200
the more responsibility that lies on your shoulders.
682
00:34:55,200 --> 00:34:58,200
And really, if you look at it from an investment point of view,
683
00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:00,200
it doesn't even make much sense.
684
00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:03,200
Because when you go to cash out,
685
00:35:03,200 --> 00:35:05,200
you're going to suck up all the liquidity.
686
00:35:05,200 --> 00:35:10,200
So why stakeholders would become a part,
687
00:35:10,200 --> 00:35:13,200
not try to own or control?
688
00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:17,200
Usually, you build these things that are resistant to that.
689
00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:20,200
If someone tried to get a hold,
690
00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:25,200
it would become apparent very quickly.
691
00:35:25,200 --> 00:35:27,200
You also have the free market.
692
00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:29,200
The idea is to have a thinner supply,
693
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:32,200
make that sort of attack hard to do.
694
00:35:32,200 --> 00:35:36,200
And really, it would have to be more seen as a malicious attack
695
00:35:36,200 --> 00:35:38,200
rather than a smart investment.
696
00:35:38,200 --> 00:35:40,200
Because the amount you'd have to buy
697
00:35:40,200 --> 00:35:43,200
and the risk you'd have to take on with such a thin supply,
698
00:35:43,200 --> 00:35:46,200
if you were to do this game theory correct,
699
00:35:46,200 --> 00:35:48,200
wouldn't make sense.
700
00:35:48,200 --> 00:35:51,200
So it would have to be some sort of outside of attack.
701
00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:53,200
And if that was the case,
702
00:35:53,200 --> 00:35:56,200
there's always the last resort where communities can fork out.
703
00:35:56,200 --> 00:35:58,200
Let's get a bit off topic.
704
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:04,200
Yeah, and then it's also in the interest of the community
705
00:36:04,200 --> 00:36:10,200
to keep a keen awareness of how big the whales are in the ecosystem
706
00:36:10,200 --> 00:36:13,200
and how much percent of the supply that they've got.
707
00:36:13,200 --> 00:36:16,200
And it's, of course, in the interest of the whales
708
00:36:16,200 --> 00:36:18,200
to be somewhat public about that,
709
00:36:18,200 --> 00:36:20,200
but at least demonstrate to the community
710
00:36:20,200 --> 00:36:23,200
that they're not trying to accumulate the whole supply.
711
00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:25,200
And there's like a limit.
712
00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:28,200
Some whales have got 1%, some 2%.
713
00:36:28,200 --> 00:36:32,200
You see some ecosystems where you get a whale with 5%.
714
00:36:32,200 --> 00:36:35,200
But when you start getting past 5%,
715
00:36:35,200 --> 00:36:38,200
you're really starting to get to a centralized decision-making process,
716
00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:40,200
a centralized vote,
717
00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:43,200
a centralized point of failure in the ecosystem,
718
00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:47,200
especially when it's parameter coin voting.
719
00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:52,200
So, yeah, shrewd whales will not accumulate more than
720
00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:57,200
between 1% and 3%, 4%, maybe 5% of the supply.
721
00:36:58,200 --> 00:37:01,200
Shrewd communities will just nudge that whale from time to time
722
00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:06,200
to let them know that they know how much that whale is accumulating.
723
00:37:06,200 --> 00:37:09,200
And, of course, there's a fork-out risk that Dan just mentioned,
724
00:37:09,200 --> 00:37:14,200
but we'll talk about that in later chapters,
725
00:37:14,200 --> 00:37:17,200
where the community can fork the whale out and leave the whale
726
00:37:17,200 --> 00:37:26,200
if they judge that whale as being non-malevolent, malevolent to the community.
727
00:37:26,200 --> 00:37:31,200
The same goes for the founders, the ICO stakes, the pre-mines,
728
00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:34,200
any venture capital or anything that looks like venture capital.
729
00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:37,200
If it starts to accumulate a large amount of token,
730
00:37:37,200 --> 00:37:41,200
then the community needs to move towards figuring out a way
731
00:37:41,200 --> 00:37:46,200
to marginalize the effect of that on the community itself.
732
00:37:46,200 --> 00:37:49,200
So, for example, there's nothing wrong with a big hedge fund
733
00:37:49,200 --> 00:37:51,200
accumulating loads of stablecoin,
734
00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:55,200
but the second they move that, let's say it's $100 million worth,
735
00:37:55,200 --> 00:38:03,200
so it's a significant size vote, let's say it's 10, 15% of the vote.
736
00:38:03,200 --> 00:38:06,200
The second they start moving that to the main token
737
00:38:06,200 --> 00:38:11,200
and powering that token up or locking it up and using it to vote,
738
00:38:11,200 --> 00:38:13,200
that's a massive security risk to the community
739
00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:16,200
because they can bring in their own consensus.
740
00:38:16,200 --> 00:38:22,200
So the community needs to have a time period between the voting and the lockup.
741
00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:24,200
So when you lock up, you have to wait a certain amount of time
742
00:38:24,200 --> 00:38:25,200
before you can vote.
743
00:38:25,200 --> 00:38:29,200
So the community can decide what it wants to do with this new entity
744
00:38:29,200 --> 00:38:34,200
that's decided to power up a load of the governance token.
745
00:38:34,200 --> 00:38:38,200
And we'll talk, again, we'll talk more about that in later chapters as well
746
00:38:38,200 --> 00:38:41,200
and how to defend against it.
747
00:38:41,200 --> 00:38:44,200
But, yeah, I mean, these are things the community needs to be keen on,
748
00:38:44,200 --> 00:38:48,200
keep an eye out for, and make sure they stay in check.
749
00:38:48,200 --> 00:38:50,200
The next section will be reputation.
750
00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:54,200
Any final thoughts on this section, Don, in terms of distribution?
751
00:38:54,200 --> 00:38:58,200
Sure.
752
00:38:58,200 --> 00:39:06,200
So anyone that converts an amount of the Hive Power governance coin
753
00:39:06,200 --> 00:39:09,200
that is centralizing is seen as an attack vector,
754
00:39:09,200 --> 00:39:11,200
or at least should be seen as an attack vector.
755
00:39:11,200 --> 00:39:14,200
So it doesn't matter if you're right or wrong,
756
00:39:14,200 --> 00:39:17,200
whatever your reasons are, they're benevolent or not.
757
00:39:17,200 --> 00:39:23,200
The moment that there is a centralized amount of consensus,
758
00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:28,200
of governance coin in one entity's hands, it's an attack vector.
759
00:39:28,200 --> 00:39:34,200
So you want to mitigate that with delays so you can see it coming
760
00:39:34,200 --> 00:39:41,200
and you can act as a community and, you know, put safeguards, parameters,
761
00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:44,200
because that's the thing about governance is it always evolves.
762
00:39:44,200 --> 00:39:46,200
It's not stagnant.
763
00:39:46,200 --> 00:39:50,200
So a new attack might come and you have to make a parameter on the fly,
764
00:39:50,200 --> 00:39:52,200
which we've seen in practice before.
765
00:39:52,200 --> 00:39:57,200
So it's important to understand that as an investor,
766
00:39:57,200 --> 00:40:03,200
you do not want to come in and buy a centralizing amount of the coin
767
00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:05,200
because that is called a money attack.
768
00:40:05,200 --> 00:40:10,200
So you are directly attacking the chain, thus putting the chain at risk
769
00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:15,200
and yourself, the value, or at least the coins that you have at risk
770
00:40:15,200 --> 00:40:20,200
of being forked, frozen, whatever the community decides with the attack.
771
00:40:20,200 --> 00:40:21,200
.
772
00:40:21,200 --> 00:40:26,200
Yeah, it has to be powered up.
773
00:40:26,200 --> 00:40:28,200
It has to be consensus coin.
774
00:40:28,200 --> 00:40:32,200
So it has to be seen as, oh, I am powering up enough
775
00:40:32,200 --> 00:40:36,200
to overtake all the governance on the chain.
776
00:40:36,200 --> 00:40:40,200
I'll have predominant voting power, 51%.
777
00:40:40,200 --> 00:40:43,200
If that is seen, it should be stopped.
778
00:40:43,200 --> 00:40:45,200
It's an attack.
779
00:40:45,200 --> 00:40:49,200
There's never, ever a good reason that that should be allowed.
780
00:40:49,200 --> 00:40:50,200
.
781
00:40:50,200 --> 00:40:55,200
So it should be known that you don't do that.
782
00:40:55,200 --> 00:41:01,200
And if you do, expect that it's like being a bad validator on proof of stake.
783
00:41:01,200 --> 00:41:03,200
You lose your funds, right?
784
00:41:03,200 --> 00:41:09,200
Well, that's sort of what you're risking if you're coming in trying to monopolize.
785
00:41:09,200 --> 00:41:14,200
Whether you know it or not, that's why education is important on this.