As a Venezuelan and like many others here, I think this very poorly defined some points here:
The expense of the 485 being a high daily expense for something that, as many others have said, there are already several options that are very well done that have been implemented.
1- A better breakdown of expenses, payments, marketing, travel, adoption, development, if possible upload an excel specifying and clarifying these things, it gives a very good impression to have this data
2- Being like many others and saying it yourself, adoption will be worked on more, in that case it is not easier to establish an association with a key chain and promote the adoption of the tool, with a proposal focused on marketing and not on the development of a tool with functionality 95% similar to another.
3- being focused on the adoption of what metrics are managed, or what way of ROI is proposed for hive, imagine that there will be some type of period to obtain results, and verifiable achievements.