You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Splinterlands: Collection Power analysis

in Splinterlands4 years ago

I completely agree with your proposal. It makes little sense to me that my (beta+Untamed/regular foil) deck is complete (except for PJ and Dricken) and maxed (except for maybe 2 cards and the new reward cards), yet still there are 98 people with a higher collection score....
Taking every playable card into consideration + giving alpha and gf a bonus doesn't provide the information that is important to break things up into leagues, imo...

Sort:  

Yes, that is exactly what I try to say!
The current implementation of Collection Power is more about monetary value of the collection and not deck strength in battles. And it does not lead to creating real separate leagues. Yeah, it solves some problems, but I don't think it's the optimal way.

If 2 million is enough to be in top10, what does it mean to have 10M or 15M? It does not make these decks any stronger. So how to build thresholds for leagues if Collection Power does not actually evaluate the strength of the deck. 1lvl deck with some gold foils (epics / legendaries) is not Silver/Gold level deck. It is still a 1lvl deck and shouldn't play in Silver / Gold league.

1lvl deck with some gold foils (epics / legendaries) is not Silver/Gold level deck. It is still a 1lvl deck and shouldn't play in Silver / Gold league.

Exactly... I don't see how they'll be able to put up a fair system is they don't change the way collection power is calculated