Pretty much the only way to win tic-tac-toe is to go first, take the center square, and then hope your opponent doesn't move into a corner. Then you can force a win by moving into a corner.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Pretty much the only way to win tic-tac-toe is to go first, take the center square, and then hope your opponent doesn't move into a corner. Then you can force a win by moving into a corner.
#spoilers
Lol yeah basically the case but I was just asking in general if bots count as cheating
i wouldn't call bots "cheating"... a bot also has to play by the rules enforced on the 2nd layer protocol...
but bots can be an unfair advantage and spoil the fun for normal players.
definitely something to consider when designing an app.
yeah bots are cheating which is exactly why it would be so hard to design a game on blockchain with a financial incentive. The motivation to Sybil attack the network is quite high.
I've always wondered why people are so comfortable with paying to play games like fortnight and the rest but whenever blockchain is attached to a game, it always requires earnings. 🤔
I wouldn't say a blockchain game requires earnings as much as it does ownership. Ownership and power over the product must be decentralized to the community. The problem here is that you can't really separate ownership from earnings because anyone could sell what they own. Without this dynamic there is no reason to use crypto or blockchain tech to begin with, doing so would just make the product less efficient, more complicated, and harder to scale.
Yeah this pretty much sums it up really. Everything is so damn ceremonious and drawn out.