Hes asking and i make the call on how much i think he/she deserves. The funding starts, its payed daily and the vote slider cancels your vote after 30% (or whatever) of the time.
I can say i value someone work at however much i want to value it.
Your objections are strange and dont really have much to do with my suggestion. This would be an additional option that would do good, you dont have to use it if you do not want to use it. Just click 100% every time.
Seems youre objecting for the sake of objecting.
"Seems like you're objecting for the sake of objecting"
Ah, you wanna play... okay :). For the sake of common sense and logic, I'll try to explain.
First off, I think your starting point in understanding what a proposal is about may be a little bit off track, which makes it hard for you to see/understand that your suggestion is rather obsolete and an option that disrespect applicant requests.
Secondly, the purpose of filing a proposal is to improve the blockchain, right? To be able to measure the amount of funding that is needed, the applicant has to calculate the time and resources it takes and cost. Depending on someone's experience, expertise, and skillset, they require to ask an hourly rate accordingly to that.
What you're suggesting, is the same as bargaining on a marketplace, except you're demanding a 70% discount, which is rude and ignorant. A problem that arises with your suggestion is that if everyone can say that they want to fund it for 5%, 10%, or 40%, the applicant will never get 100% funded. You simply cannot question someone's pay rate, but you can decline, or agree with it.
Lastly, a proposal is not about what you think a person deserves. In fact, it has nothing to do with what you think a person deserves. It is about the content of a proposal: cost/product. Again: if asked-funding equals and requires 100% and you want to fund 30%, you can't expect a 100% return as 100% is required. Unless you're okay by having an unfinished product.