I don't like this. Many other similar agents were cancelled here and I don't think it's fair this one gets a different treatment even with comment rewards going to the DHF.
Would be better for the outputs to be kept offchain (perhaps cached somewhere) and just expand the existing functionality (the AI dropdown menu) for custom prompts.
This sound strange. What do you mean with "cancelled". Who has the power to cancel something on Hive?
I get how/why other ai-bots have been downvoted, but as you pointed out this is 100% rewards to the DHF.
Cancelling something in the context of cancel culture refers to social disapproval or discontent usually by a group (which in this case are stakeholders). It usually involves downvotes and it is not censorship.
But the point is ...downvoted because people disagree with rewards or downvoted because the content should not be on the blockchain?
Spam was often cited as a reason even with rewards declined. @hiveusmaximus was an example (here and here). The owner stopped working on it as a result.
I'm checking the comments here: https://peakd.com/@hiveusmaximus/comments
Honestly it seems a completely different thing.
can you link me to those interactions please
A few of them on @hiveusmaximus were good examples (here, here and here) that had its rewards declined.