Sort:  

Well, you are still here aren't you. Which still supports the fact, everyone can.

Problem is always the same in life... balance.

I like to think everyone should be given the same opportunity, but eventually things will auto-limit themselves.

People are free to choose with whom they interact, and ignore the ones they don't want to. And I feel that's going to be something that improves over time on Hive. It's not about transparency or censoring, because everything is already openly on the chain (if its a skills thing for some, sorry, life needs balance too).

But instead, it starts to be the bridge that will add value to the technology (in my view its already adding tons, but just as a process classification here). And the common world (maybe I am part of it too), just needs solutions for real problems (and to also balance the ones that have less skills). And from there, the rest will come.

Sustainability has to come first, otherwise things may get ill, and that might scare some... but when you know the motivation and when you can see why we are doing certain things (including code wise)... that afraid goes away. And you suddenly see a much brighter place. Even if you know there are going to be holes and stones to move away.

Life is short, in essence. (and I did went all over the place again... damn it)

Sustainability comes last on Hive.

I don't agree, even if weight wise things might spec a different picture.

There is too much going out and absolutely nothing developed to bring anything back.
any new developments is more ways to give more away.

Are you specifically talking about DHF money?

DHF will probably have the biggest impact right now,
At the moment. Before any account outside of the DHF cashes out a few pennies.

40K HIVE in purchase is needed to cover the cost of proposals.
That is 40K HIVE going on the market in the hope someone will buy a declining value.

Some proposals seek 100K to 300K to cover costs over a short period of time.
thats 4 Million HIVE someone needs to buy.

The basic economics does not look good to anyone viewing and researching an investment.

So, what would you propose to fix "economically" the DHF money being such a weight? - specifically...

I mean, using something that does not burn collectively through 1000's of hours of work changing the code to make it right...

(Note, I was not speaking about DHF specifically, but now I am interested in speaking about it)