Ecency curators read and review hundreds of posts each day and decide if a post shows enough effort to receive an Ecency vote.
I apologize if the gifs we leave annoy you. We will be more cautious.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ecency curators read and review hundreds of posts each day and decide if a post shows enough effort to receive an Ecency vote.
I apologize if the gifs we leave annoy you. We will be more cautious.
First of all, you should've sent this comment to @hivegc as I'm not them and I didn't leave that reply to your curator.
Secondly, I noticed some Ecency curators trying to engage genuinely when they curate. But there are some lazy curators (I don't know how they're lazier than me, lol) who don't give a damn about engagement, and they also want people to know they curated the post, and that too just with a banner.
I also used to do it when I curated for Splinterlands. Then I realized it's not the right thing to do. Everyone should realize at a point, without getting pissed off, in my opinion.
Why come in here and defend a spammer? Does this look like curation to you?
They were asked not to spam and instantly went on the offensive on the author, telling them they won't get curated anymore, etc, and now you're double teaming on the author just cause you're affiliated with the same "curator".
Shameless.
I see it as an announcement that the post has been reviewed for a curation vote. I also see that this curator has spent a lot of his time giving out awards on deserving posts.
Okay but not sure why you're both talking towards the author who did nor said anything against it when it was the community account kindly asking the "curator" not to spam if that's what we wanna call them these days.