I think transparency is key. In Hive, it is frowned upon to use AI to create the content for you, and I honestly don't see that changing anytime soon. After all, the highest stake holders all share that point of view. I think its more fun and enjoyable to make my own posts instead of having ChatGPT write it out for me, but that might just be me. Honestly, I think one of the biggest faults is that people can't admit they are wrong. It sounds like the person just tried to justify what they did, when they knew it was unfair. Sure, Hive is decentralized, but stake matters when it comes to who is rewarded.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I feel like looking at the issue in a diplomatic way will relieve any tension and prevent further downvotes. The creator themselves have been here for a while and they're dedicated community members. I just think by now they should find a way to leverage what we have to make their contents.
AI debates chases people away and it can be disappointing to lose people because of AI debacles