If they only vote for the person
I've told you at least twice now, including my original comment that it's not "only" for the person but both are in the equation, some times a person could write a shitpost as well that doesn't mean I'd curate them based on the name and history behind it alone. Some times it may seem they barely had any engagement on a post or they've been a bit farmy lately, etc, there's many factors behind my curation which is only manual. I don't go around throwing bloaty dust votes like you seem to have been doing while most of your stake was delegated away.
Not mentioning that you didn't write the content you're posting on your personal blog is not deceiving anyone? Really?
Ask others what they think about it? Why would I make something like this up and jeopardize my own reputation just to hurt yours? Why would I be here explaining myself and the situation if I just wanted to fuck you over and why would I have landed here in the first place asking what happened if it wasn't to try and help you out?
Instead you go on these rants and threaten with retaliation and stuff, get a grip.
You're the one making an issue about a one-time instant that happened more than 6 months ago. Since then I've been writing all my own stuff taking my own pictures and engaging, believe me or not that's up to you. I had enough drama dealing with that ghost riding issue for the first time so why would I risk doing it a second time? I don't know? It's not like I need the money here I make perfectly good money online doing multiple other things, and day trading dwarfs would it make on this platform at least 100x.. Yes I use Auto voting Bots if you want to get mad at me about that well then change the code. And now you want to slander me and say that I'm still doing other things...
So despite my personal belief go striving is not a crime, I'm not engaging in it, and you can't prove that I am engaging it (something I am not) . So unless you want to get mad at me for something that happened over 6 months ago and keep dragging this out. That's up to you.
It's not a "crime" but I'm sure most stakeholders are against it when you don't mention that's what it is which is the main issue I had with you before you started pointing fingers towards me or calling me names.
I actually have nothing against your intentions, if they were more transparent (i.e. costs, fees you take for it and if or not you profit off of it) I wouldn't even mind it, you wanted to improve SEO for certain dapps and help get more traffic towards our front-ends. You do realize that had you just been transparent that it's not your content I wouldn't have an issue with it and potentially even defended you or helped out if I deemed it worthy of the traffic it might bring.
Instead you chose to go down this route, while I can understand your frustration that you had to deal with it back then already it's not like what happened was unwarranted and since I asked you about it you knew it was something from x months ago to begin with. It's not like I'm here every day bugging you about what happened.
Nothing is up to me, I'm sure most of the community would agree with me on this issue. Just be transparent if content isn't yours so curators, at least the manual ones know about it and can vote accordingly thus they're not being deceived and maybe they'd be able to find out what you're trying to do rather than becoming transparent about it after you're caught with plagiarised content. It's really not rocket science but you keep being combatitive about it and I'm done wasting time now.
So what are you going to do?
Are you going to keep downloading me or are you going to move on?
That's the big issue. That will determine my next actions as well.
The ball is in your court.
I curate manually so similar to my upvotes I some times forget about some authors I'd wanna upvote and make sure they don't end up with 0 or close to 0 rewards (depending on content), this of course also means I some times forget to adjust rewards on those I think get overrewarded for one reason or another according to my opinions.
Either way knowing your stance on ghostwriting I'm going to make sure I don't accidentally reward you with stake in the future in case you're up to the old ways again.
Hmm, I see.
Right here you had a chance to set things straight and say you'd move on. Your chance to make peace . Say let's be friends and move forward together with a better understanding.
But instead you opted to choose to again slander me, again accuse me of things and make assumptions.
Haha, nice, I like the game bro... We can play it. So I'll let you know I may or may not let this go. I may or may not take additional actions to escalate this to the next level. Let's find out. Because I can guarantee you that the next level of actions that I'll be taking... maybe or maybe not, will be sizable. Let's see. :)
My comment above and my action to mute you pointed towards me eventually forgetting about your existence which I deemed to be fair given you may have kept on creating your own content since the situation 6 months ago. My recent downvotes were towards you defending the right to continue doing said operation even though I and others in your apology post pointed out that it's not accepted and frowned upon, the same apology post you stated:
I'm not even downvoting you cause of your own accusations and assumptions towards me or the overreaction to downvotes resulting in namecalling which I'm sure others would.
You still seem to think that I'm the one that needs to apologize for what occurred here and your tone seems to sound like you think I'd back away due to threats of downvotes cast by you. If korean stakeholders with 50m SP weren't able to change the way I do things on the chain or how frequently I post/comment or downvote them for content I deem overrewarded or unfair of rewards I don't think you're going to do much else aside from driving more people toward reading this dumb conversation. Be my guest I guess, let's see what the people on your side have to say about it, although I can't see any in your recent posts aside from myself.
Sounds good; let the fun begin. :)