Yes, what i often state flies in the face of materialist physics.
That is because modern materialist physics is at best severely hampered by disconnecting itself from metaphysics.
Many people notice and talk about a feeling of knowing that someone they cared about died.
There are people who have worked to make this sense even stronger, and can tell much more about any living entity.
It is only because we ignore such things as superstition, that we all do not work on our extra senses.
I have had too much experiences with such to start ignoring them.
Time has a waveform. Time is a loop, a circle. And thus, its form is that of wave function.
Further, talking about Schrödinger, you should be familiar with "wave forms collapsing."
This is why i used this terminology.
Yes, its all about emotions.
When you change time lines. When you try to change a future. Its all about emotions.
It doesn't matter one iota what you do, if you do not change the emotional structure, that future will happen.
So, lets say you were foretold that you would be in a bus accident.
And you wanted to avoid it.
The typical person decides they will stay home... and thus avoid buses... except the bus comes crashing through the front wall.
Or if you decided, i don't believe in superstitions, you got onto a bus that had an accident.
The future isn't set in that its a certain, specific time and place.
No, what is set is the "accident" and the emotions caused by it.
Again, this is from personal experience. Watching it happen over and over.
And then trying to change things, over and over.
The only thing that helps someone who will commit suicide is to change their emotions.
You have to change them from powerlessness and despair, to hope and the feeling of the future getting better.
Much of what i have stated can have its beginnings seen in modern double slit experiments.
Yes, the light travels back in time to interfere with itself. (but that is only an interpretation from a linear view of time. Our view of time is incorrect.)
I don't agree, but I respect your idea in metaphysical matters.
But to say that Schrödinger's idea is wrong, as you said "a false premise", is to completely deny the understanding of matter itself we acquired by mean of Schrödinger's (and other people) ideas. I am talking on a materialistic level, of course.
For what concerns your idea about what time is, what role emotions play in the "sensible world", it could be interesting to talk, but, it not need quantum mechanics or the critics to all the research done 'till now.
A old good metaphysics is always welcome, but it is what it is: speculation. Unless you prove it. Because even for metaphysics, it may be defined (in an epistemological way) a proof. And that's an other story.
exactly. I no longer agree with modern materialistic science.
I have seen too many disproofs of all the big formulas
such as:
Further, i have experienced many thing in the ways of metaphysics. Such as changing the past.
And, what really sucks is that NONE of these can be proven.
I change my past, and all you remember is the new past.
You will say, "nothing changed, where's your proof?"
However i have met many people who have had similar experiences.