What's the proof for the virus?
250+ countries around the world, tens of thousands of doctors in each country, that's tens of millions of doctors. At least a few doctors would have spoken out, no? Statistically, if the virus did not exist, some doctor would have said so, no?
In fact, I reckon that if doctors all around the world were noticing the pattern of "no virus but they tell me to say there is a virus", hell would break loose with all the doctors saying that the virus is a hoax. But so far there is not even one news article about this.
So, I say, it's more likely that the virus does exist.
Somehow they concluded that there is a virus. How did they end up at this conclusion?
By testing... do you think that doctors just create medicine at random, following recipes and never testing their effectivity, just trusting Big Pharma?
There are many laboratories in every country dedicated to the research of diseases. In fact, major universities have disease research centers as well, and there is a whole branch of science called Biomedical Engineering (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomedical_engineering).
These laboratories are filled with people dedicated to this field. Many of them are passionate about what they do.
i agree with all you said. My curiosity doesn't refer to the medicine. It refers to the virus.
How did they identify the virus?
Each virus has identifiable traits that make them different from others. When you have people with new symptoms and contagion methods, you know you're dealing with something new, so grab the blood of many people with similar symptoms, you put their blood under a microscope and you can see what they have in common when compared to healthy blood. You also compare it to other viruses.
https://www.sciencealert.com/this-is-what-the-covid-19-virus-looks-like-under-electron-microscopes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/niaid/albums/72157712914621487/with/49531042877/
You don't have to look at it directly, though. When you're dealing with new symptoms, new forms of transmission, etc., you know you're dealing with something new. When a virus infects a person, it also affects the surroundings. You can look at the antibodies, for example, and by examining them, you can notice whether a person has been infected with COVID-19 in the past, even if they are already "cured".
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html
There are petabytes of reference information against which these samples can be compared. Everything from chemicals, antibodies, previous vaccines and drugs... you can apply many tests and arrive to conclusions about the nature of a disease (viral, bacterial, etc.), the origin, etc.
The testing procedures they use are not designed to identify a virus.
What do you think about that?