Definitely getting like an echo chamber, which is why I published a modified, more traditional journalistic, version of this article on medium.
he's got a shit load of cash, and he can take back this chain as soon as he's ready to HF out binance's and his own stake.
I'm not so sure about this as during the witness meeting he gave every indication of having already spent more than he wanted too in regards to the stake. If it wasn't just a pack of lies, it sounds like he wants to sell all, or part of, his stake. He didn't seem to grasp that Ned's pre-mine of that stake came with provisions of use as far as everyone is concerned.
He kept saying stuff like "I know you guys have problems with Ned, go after him not me."
Co-ordination would work, but I don't think anyone's that interested!
It really could. A 3 or 4 point list of facts bombarded by everyone would at least inform the whole of crypto twitter the (potential) illegality of Justin Sun's collusion with exchanges, and dishonesty in how he's misrepresented this whole situation.
Marketing wise the exchange issue is the winning card we hold. If SF222 was reasonable or sensible action is debatable (I personally think it was necessary), but Justin Sun's reaction was completely dishonest on so many levels and aggressive.
1: lying about nothing happening in reaction to SF222 until a discussion had happened with him and all the concensus witnesses - a delay tactic so he could put his plan into action.
2: lying on twitter about hackers - a strange and rediculous lie to be honest which had me scratching my head as to what he was thinking. I honestly think he deosn't give a fck and often says stuff to cause controversy.
3: collusion with exchanges to use stake that doesn't belong to them to vote in governance issues on steem.
Those three points are enough to completely derail whatever strategy Justin Sun is pursuing on twitter. He's even called up Ned to try and get him to join in with the spin.
At least Dan Larimer has commented on the side of the community.
The whole thing is FUBAR
It is FUBAR. I'm still trying to get my head around it.
Luke Stoke's latest vid is a good one. On YouTube, nice summary.