I upvote what I consider to have value.
Yet you can't fathom why people downvote things? The literal opposite?
I'm baffled how someone behind one of the currently most popular tokens (according to hype, I don't care much about its current price) is spending all his time defending someone who's pretty known to be an asshat dramaqueen who's mainly just been complaining for the past few years why he doesn't get upvoted and most content was about that to then get overrewarded and instantly turn the content on why people are disagreeing with the rewards. For someone as intellectual as he tries to make others believe he must be really self-destructive to manage to get more people to disagree with any rewards he may get.
Reading your comments lately I find it really, really obnoxious how against downvotes you are, reminds me of the old korean stakeholders at the presentation they held on steemfest. You also seem weirdly obsessed with defending the same user you're giving most of your rewardpool to. Since your tokenomics are similar to BTC, imagine if such a big part of the early mining had gone to someone as unstable and obviously in it just for the money as lucy instead of making sure it has a wide distribution without favoritism.
Edit: I see now it wasn't your votes in the screenshots above but other stakeholders. Seeing as how against downvoting you are and allowing blatant votetrading to occur I'd stay far away from investing in that token.
Where did you get the idea that I can't fathom the reason for the downvote? I use it often and consider to be a valuable tool to fight against plagiarism and abuse.
You don't seem to be paying attention and I don't feel like taking the time to bring you up to speed.
You literally explain it in your next sentence, downvotes can be used for a lot more things than plagiarism and abuse.
I did read through most comments in this thread and the way you talk is pretty similar to Lucy, trying to use any word you can to make others bothering to explain to you the reason why they used their stake to downvote something against them and making it out as they're lying or trying to trick you. Basically being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative. Keep spending your time like this if you want your token to look like a bigger joke than the top earner's list of it.
I was referring to the rest of your comment. I'm doing the best I can and I've spent too much time today responding to @azircon whose stated goal was to take away someone's POB rewards. I don't see the downvote campaign against @lucylin as justified, but if you do that's up to you.
That's not the only thing you spent time on, you were trying really hard to make others be portrayed as liars on the first comment I downvoted of yours. I don't know who you are, most likely someone who's been on Hive before you decided to squat a popular name, paste the most popular tokenomics on it and go around starting drama to draw it more attention so you can make a quick buck without it really having any innovation or unique usecase, but if you're going to behave like another asshat when others take their time to explain their own downvotes on a post of an author that's not even you to you who just jumped in to defend and question it, then maybe try to not sound like the asshole you're choosing to be.
Again. Please stop repeating yourself. We have been patient with you, but won't be for long.