You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proof of NO brain is exposed by using the 'having skin in the game' as a valid argument.

in Proof of Brain3 years ago

OK, I understand now.

So I should probably make two clarifications about the new project then: 1) it won't rely on any single centralized web site (although we can expect that helper sites will merge), so there'll be no need for terms and conditions associated with it, other than the basic legal terms and conditions involved with use of free software and 2) the new project is focused on giving people more tools for evaluating the truth of the all information they receive, not just reporting intentionally-generated false information (i.e. it's not narrowly focused on what I suspect you're referring to as "abuse").

In other words, some people say false things intentionally, sometimes by mistake. I want to build a system that helps you decide the truth in both cases. The second case is really the harder problem, as you might imagine, although even spotting simple deception can be tough enough sometimes.

Sort:  

Ah yes, that sounds good. Kind of like a fact check system. There was alot of misinformation going around about the Vax and deaths from COVID etc. I try to avoid those posts, I know everyone is entitled to their opinion and free speech but there is also a line when it can cause significant harm.