You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Announcement of My Intent to File a Future Proposal Regarding ‘Rules for Downvoting’ in the Proof-of-Brain Tribe

I hate the whole concept of "over-rewarded." It reminds me very much of people who hate billionaires because they aren't one. If someone like @allcapsonezero creates a post that everyone in the entire Hive-sphere loves and adores, then @allcapsonezero should reap the benefit of such a post. If someone spends thousands of fiat money on proofofbrain tokens to gain more voting power, the value of pob goes up...which is kinda the point, in my opinion. At the same time, they have more voting power where they also reap a benefit from curation. I promise if I was only expecting meager returns from my posts, curation, and leasing, I would never have put fiat money into the system in exchange for the token. I don't like petty downvoting, and I'm not a fan of automatic upvoting either. I think people should manually vote...but that's another story for another post :)

As someone who creates content for YouTube where I'm restricted to 100 uploads per day and have hit that limit dozens of times, I'm not a huge fan of limits for quality posts...now the question is, what is quality? I made a list of reasons I think a DV could be warranted in a comment above (assuming it stays where it's at lol )...but those are my thoughts. If they become accepted by the community, it becomes a helpful standard...the point of bringing the subject up.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

You really shouldn't be talking about DV's, you're abusing them incredibly, and targeting people, just because you don't like them. I am over it, but just pointing out, you're talking crap!