That study seems very odd to me. Patients in most cases were given some combination of vaccines Pfizer/Moderna being the most common combo. That's not how it's done in real life (at least not normally). Also, one of your links mentioned that the Moderna vaccine led to 3 times the rate of heart problems than the Pfizer vaccine. Mixing all the stats together as if there was one vaccine gives somewhat of a false impression. But knowing that certainly makes the Pfizer vaccine seem a lot safer.
I get the impression that gateway pundit article is very misleading as well. It talks about myocarditis increasing you risk of death by a lot within 5 years, however my understanding is that would be for a chronic condition. While the mRNA vaccines may have myocarditis as a possible side effect, it is an immune response and is usually temporary and self limiting. That isn't to say it can't be dangerous, it certainly can. But not in the long term way that article indicates. Most myocarditis cases triggered by the vaccine are mild and treatable or self resolving with no long term effects likely. While you might not be able to say definitively that the vaccine won't have long term effects, the likely long term effects of myocarditis specifically can be determined by severity. While there may be a 1/1000 (0.1%) chance of myocarditis, the chances of a severe case with potential long term side effects is much smaller than that.
As you indicate, Facebook will do whatever Facebook does because they do it for money. That doesn't really say anything about the veracity or accuracy of the comments though.
People want to proscribe some sinister motive for pushing the vaccines but it is really simple. Covid spreads much easier and faster than the flu, it also has symptoms that, on average, are somewhat worse than the average flu strain. Hospitals do not typically have lots of extra capacity in the best of times. It wouldn't be too difficult, if COVID were just left to run rampant, for hospitals to be overwhelmed. If this happens, even more people will die. The vaccine is supposed to slow the spread, reduce your chance for hospitalization and reduce your chance of death. It SEEMS to be doing that. As far as risk factors, well, if you are a young adult male, consider the J&J vaccine over Pfizer or Moderna. If you are a female of child bearing age consider Pfizer or Moderna over J&J. If you are not in one of those groups, flip a coin. The point is, the risks are pretty well known and publicized. You even have to sign something that says you have read what they are before getting the vaccine. It's easy to make a choice that limits your exposure to risk even further.
I keep hearing conflicting stories about how in some places, most hospitalized people are vaccinated and in others they are not. I'm not sure of the reason for that. I can say that here in Florida, most hospitalized people have been unvaccinated...by a very large margin (95+%). Most of the stories that show the opposite seem to be coming out of Israel but i'm not sure of the origin. News articles that I have read out of Israel indicate that the Pfizer vaccine is only ~40% effective against the Delta variant but still highly effective vs. hospitalization and death. I suppose that it also may be true that there is a genetic component where the vaccine works better in some groups than in others.
I think whether there is a sinister motive behind the vaccines will come out when they finally figure out one hundred percent for sure where the virus originated and how it came to cross the animal to human barrier but I have to admit recent release of a proposal for funding to spray bats in a bat cave that was denied falls within the guidelines of how we are seeing this virus unfold. Though they were denied funding it didn't mean they didn't move forward with their project. That's a whole different byline then speaking of moving forward with a vaccine that was rushed onto the masses.
Yes any medication can effect a different subset of individuals differently. (Asian, African Americans, Arabs, etc.,) just based on genetics. It may be rare but it's been known to happen, rare because they'd only use it if they couldn't modify it for use for the populace as a whole but had significant benefit to others.
I have to disagree on the heart inflammation because I have not seen one doctor step forward to say that any inflammation of the heart in regards to being minor doesn't leave some form of heart damage behind. Whether minor, major or in between that damage is for life. I would think that is why there's a shorter to longer time frame given in speaking of people who will ultimately die as a result of the damage, obviously it would seem minor heart damage recipients will not die within the same time frame as those who suffered more severe complications.
I found this news article to be quite alarming that out today:
According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), since July 2 there have been 9,619 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which 48 per cent (4,635) were not caused by Covid-19.
So if all these extra people are not dying from coronavirus, what is killing them?
Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.
Acute and chronic respiratory infections were also up with 3,416 more mentions on death certificates than expected since the start of July, while there have been 1,234 extra urinary system disease deaths, 324 with cirrhosis and liver disease and 1,905 with diabetes. (a href = "https://www.yahoo.com/news/analysis-thousands-more-usual-dying-170117640.html">
They are attributing it to people not seeking care during the pandemic last year or having care delayed because of the pandemic. I find it rather puzzling that they haven't seen this onset of extra deaths until July 2 of this year, I mean if deaths were trending upwards from those not seeking care call me suspicious if you like but I hardly doubt you could calculate a specific timeframe whereas all these individuals just suddenly started collapsing into the thrones of death, you'd think you see them saying there's been a gradual increase in these deaths and are now rising at alarming rates. In other words you'd think you see this as a slowly rising phenomena due to limited hospital resources. What else I find interesting is that people are dying from what doctors are seeing in vaccinated individuals, heart and organ failure. The ischemic heart conditions myocardial infarction falls within that realm. The fact they are seeing these increase after vaccination instead of pre vaccination is questionable in my opinion.
When you have doctors telling the FDA we are killing two people for every one person we are saving mainly just so we have open space in the hospital to save that person just doesn't add up to common sense. When these doctors are saying this in essence they are saying these people are dying as a direct result of the vaccines. There's a reason why on a lot of the television commercials you see, and a lot of comedians have used these commercials to make jokes out of, that say if you suffer from diabetes, have had heart problems, have sleep disorders, take MAOI's, have had urinary tract infections, are pregnant and nursing....etc., etc., etc, and that's just for one medication being advertised in the commercial should tell you all you need to know as to why one shoe will not fit everybody, that is why we will see millions of deaths if this isn't stop. Those deaths will continue for years afterwards because not just with the heart disease issue but many people have autoimmune disorders/diseases that they have no idea they have, they will come to fruition later in these people's lives and chances are better than not the vaccines can accelerate these processes. This would also be true of young children, these things should be concerning. There are many people out there who are under the impression that people who do succumb to the vaccine are doing so for the good of humanity as a whole. I beg to differ on that, no one should be able to offer themselves up as a sacrificial lamb for the betterment or wellbeing of others, exactly how would they feel if someone personally asked them to kill themselves because the world would be better off without them? If it takes two people dying to save one the trade off just isn't there.