You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Distribution. A #1 task.

in Proof of Brain3 years ago

I hope you don't mind me commenting without being asked? Since I am not part of the circle of people involved.

If you were to make such a publication about a business partner in your offline life, it would not only be presumptuous, but perhaps reputationally damaging and the business partner could take action against you. In fact, it would probably be more damaging to your own reputation if your business partners had to assume that you were peddling their affairs.

This makes me wonder whether you really take the matter as seriously as it appears on the surface? Discrediting someone is very easy online and that is why many people do it that way and basically, as can also be observed, people get along again as if nothing had happened. I don't rule that out.

I assume that such would not be a real business practice on your part, since in all likelihood you yourself would not want anyone to copy a fragment from your activities, make it available to the public and then connote that we are dealing with sloppiness and nepotism?

On the other hand, there is nothing wrong in the matter if you talk to someone with whom you overlap business in the back room and draw his attention to some things, while the person so addressed perceives that you are friendly to him.

Some messages have an effect if you give them time and do not immediately press for agreement or understanding. Are you familiar with the fact that constructive criticism works in you for a while, even, or especially, if it hits a sore spot, that you nevertheless take it to heart? More in a questioning than in a judging attitude?

Is it not unwise to expose another in this way, for example, if one's aim is for business to flourish? I am irritated by the flattering comments that express gratitude, I perceive them as all too quick approval.

As an uninvolved person coming from the outside, I have the impression that there is far too much stress, rushing, judging each other too quickly, exchanging arguments that are reproachful in undertone. Lots of justification on both sides.

Personally, I'm bothered by the pressure built up in many places to be a busy and always active curator and not to have enough activities on the clock or to "distribute too few votes". For me, this is not in line with personal circumstances and decisions, as well as speed, which can vary. The high concentration on voting alone neglects the fact that people are not machines - as you yourself say - and so it happens that you let things slide that you actually wanted to tackle. Here, in this non-binding sphere, where no legal contracts are concluded, the expectations run counter to what can actually be achieved by individuals who want to build something of which they themselves may not yet know how much work they have saddled themselves with. Being under constant observation is a double-edged sword.

Good day for you.