You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: REJECTED: Formal Proposal for Rules Governing Downvoting within the “Proof of Brain” Tribe

in Proof of Brain4 years ago

Think this is a great proposal, I just want a little clarification on this if you would deem it necessary.

de minimus downvoting can be used for whatever reason, such as a ‘flag’ to alert others to investigate the post, a form of playful banter

Well I just wanted to ask, does this mean you can also use this form of downvote to like report a content that seems malicious but then not sure of? For example I feel a content is plagiarised, I'll use this downvoted to like sort of raise an alert?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

does this mean you can also use this form of downvote to like report a content that seems malicious but then not sure of? For example I feel a content is plagiarised, I'll use this downvoted to like sort of raise an alert?

That is correct. You could downvote a de minimus amount if you suspect the content is plagiarized, then you can always increase the amount of your downvote later, if your suspicions are confirmed.

You would not need to state a reason for the de minimus downvote (but you are welcome to). A larger downvote would need to state the reason.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

That is correct. You could downvote a de minimus amount if you suspect the content is plagiarized, then you can always increase the amount of your downvote later, if your suspicions are confirmed.

Wow, this is good, I do believe it helps to forestall clarification of some sorts, truth is, there should be a procedural process through which a tribe can work by and this is actually very important. Hopefully these proposal can pull through.


Posted via proofofbrain.io