I am not aware of such his goals or threads "to destroy". Nor have I ever upvoted or supported such "threats" in any form.
Or you can prove the opposite?
but you are supporting him with your upvotes.
I support and upvote facts and statements, which seem to me logical, valid and favoring the POB community, by helping to become it more transparent, more decentralized, and more fair for new and small members. Which possibly may help to disclose suspicious abuse, hidden selfishness, circle-jerking, dictatorship. Which plays in hand with general ideas and principals of dPOS.
Would you mind explaining that to me?
Does this means other POB stake holders from now on will have also to explain to tribe founders their intentions, why they have upvoted and supported certain, particular statements and/or authors ???
Or it's only me?