I see where you're coming from. Bad behavior will need to be addressed and defined before taking action. It's the reason for trost's need for a consensus: more than one person defines that behavior and then determines that a DV is needed.
If I feel your post is over-rewarded, per his proposal, I just can't DV it alone or suffer the consequences. More people need to get together and decide. Given the feel of the proposal the decision is probably to occur through a vote similar to this post.
Good take. Looking back at his proposal I don't think there is any option for feeling a post is over voted unless that falls under "bad behaviour "
Correct. The proposal is a good first step, but it's certainly not all inclusive. We would have to define these "bad behaviors". I'm putting together a list of bad behaviors I've learned about from HDR and HW to discuss in the future. I'm sure there are people in this very comment section that can provide a list by memory.
The importance of the proposal is that it makes communicating them a priority, first. It gives the community time to understand and voice their opinion.
Agree and look forward to seeing that list