I couldn't DV your article if I wanted to:
- I've read your article series. Your article has value. Each post you've written on that series seeks engagement from the community.
- It challenges the users to focus upon what you've presented and it offers a reward for engagement and successful completion of a task you assign.
- Also, the community has defined the value of your work.
- Alone, maybe it's worthy of a DV, but I haven't look at things like that and maybe I should.
The article you cite presents an interesting conundrum. I don't know how to proceed. While 50% of the beneficiary goes to the POB fund, currently about 100 goes to the author. Funds going to the POB fund doesn't shield from the appearance.
I still like this article though. I've never read about payout limits. I'm going to take your idea and expand upon it. Instead of two authors, I'm going to do a wide range of people top-down. Ask the community to discuss. We need to narrow down the subjectivity of this rewards nonsense.
Everyone needs to get on a similar page so we can just focus on damn content creation.