I think he's trying to make an honest effort. Personally, his comments and discussions with me indicate that he does need to make change, but he's uncertain how to proceed.
Did you know?
Everything insight.pob has been doing was done before in a very similar way by @Calumam when the tribe first started. Cal would also request responses from the community. Community members would comment on their own posts similar to how the respond to insight's questions.
Some similar questions have been asked before. Just like then, people like knowledge23.pob expected proofofbrainio or other whales to pick a project and run with it. I don't know if things actually work that way. On the Hive blockchain, you have to make a proposal to get funding for anything. I would imagine it's the same here. Writing an article isn't the only way to communicate.
The frustration in the community, expressed in these articles aren't really unfounded. @aiuna wrote a post herself expressing her concerns.
What's important about insight.pob's work now is that we have an opportunity to become better organized. In this manner, people who choose can develop a project proposal from the information already discussed. It at least presents a starting point.
Onealfa isn't wrong, however, in his prior discussions about responsiveness from our leader. He needs to be a bit more active in discussing what goes on behind the scenes. I hope he will soon with some of the changes he's working on. One of those ideas has me pretty excited.