Yeah, I know your message. Spending hours or days of research just to get, what seems to me, a blind downvote for no reason. When I get an upvote, I assume someone likes what I've written and trusted the quality of my content. The concept is pretty straightforward to me. I'm a little more attentive about the downvote because it does reduce my reward.
In my comment from tarazkp's post, I added that at least explain why the downvote was issued. If there's a negotiation period, then the person downvoting should explain the reasoning. If I can adjust the content on my next posting I will or just deal with the downvote if I don't agree with it.
If it's something like you mentioned, then maybe clarify the reasoning. How confusing is it to read that "your rewards are too high" with next to no explanation? I see plenty of postings with significant earnings that aren't downvoted.
I also noticed that your detractor reviewed your post. It speaks volumes.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the matter, @scholaris!
You are very welcome. More importantly, I think, thank you for your post.
Ahh, you found my typo! : -)
I fear you give me too much credit. I saw no typo. I'm not that observant so early in the morning with kids and a mischievous dog. Maybe mischievous kids too.
Ahh, you think-thanked me, and I "think you" to someone for one of their comments earlier, but just minutes before your post I went backed in and fixed my spelling error. Too funny!
Oh ok lol. I was thanking you for your post as it inspired my comment. What a coincidence about the typo.