Here's a random thought for the day: How often did we hear the term breakthrough
regarding medicine? It's usually medical breakthroughs that always had a positive connotation. So how do you spin a negative into a positive when people who have gotten the shot also get COVID-19? Let's not call it a failure when we can call it a breakthrough!
That's some pretty clever word magic from the thought controllers. I can't help but wonder what the initial psychological impression someone gets when they get told: "You're having a breakthrough case of COVID-19."
I wonder if people feel like it's a good thing? I wonder if people think: 'I'm feeling a little under the weather but in a special kind of way where the medicine is working.'

When a treatment directly causes disease, it is called iatrogenic disease, and that is just a fancy way of saying the doctor made you sick. Iatrogenic disease is the third leading cause of death in America, right under heart disease and cancer.
Big medicine doesn't particularly like to toot its own horn about this, but it's been in the public domain for quite some time now and flies right below the radar of public awareness. What do you think?
Do you think the latest use of the term breakthrough
along with cases
could be a sophisticated style of manipulating the public's perception? Or perhaps it is just a coincidence? Might I be overthinking this?
"There's a Killer on the Road"
"His Brain is Squirming Like a Toad"
He Should "Take a Long Holiday"
The People Want Him Put Away.✨
35:00 mins
to see Dr. Francis Boyle's Plan for dealing with the conspirators.
We never here the term cure, there is no money in cure is there.
Sad but true, the larger entities with the power
to do good would rather make money instead.
And money is worth nothing and backed by nothing, all for nothing is it not?
Thankee-sai, you speak true.