You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: REJECTED: Formal Proposal for Rules Governing Downvoting within the “Proof of Brain” Tribe

This proposal is to limit the use of downvotes. Downvotes within the tribe would only be allowed for a few narrowly-defined reasons.

Without these 'rules' (i.e. the status quo), anyone can downvote for any reason and any amount.

These 'rules' would force downvote wars, etc., to occur outside the "Proof of Brain" tribe.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

I am not much for rules bud, rules are where this shit show is at in 2021

I am not much for rules either.

I've observed some of the issues you've experienced with downvotes, and your statements about how you are able to be immune to them, which is great. Many people are not so fortunate.

Many people are apt to just walk away if they encounter a constant barrage of downvotes (and I probably would, too). We are trying to establish a tribe / community that is more immune to that sort of behavior.

This tribe was founded as an experiment of sorts. It's been far from perfect, but so far that experiment has been quite successful, imho. Dealing with potential downvote abuse is a crucial next step to pave the way for growth and expansion.

I am in agreement with you in part. I would add though, I would make it, IMO a down vote should require a comment as to why. And cost an up vote. People would then think twice before joining groupthink logic, and hate for no reason.

Together we build a better world. Thank you for trying. Maximum respect to you.

IMO a down vote should require a comment as to why.

I agree. I have no problem leaving a small note - why I did my DV

And cost an up vote.

I agree. I'll do anything to have MORE than one DV per day.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

@shepz1, I have posted a new proposal that requires explicit citation of the reason for every downvote.

(It also eliminates the de minimus downvote option and clarifies the procedure for evaluating suspected alt accounts.)

Both proposals will remain active until they expire (i.e. when their respective payout windows close).

You are free to vote on one or both or neither. Whichever one receives greater than 50% upvotes first will be ratified, and the other will become moot.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

poor rules, made by idiots (power hungry), is why we are in this shit show - not the principle of having rules rules - they've been in society for the last 10K years.
It's went just rules get corrupted by the manipulators, the shit show starts...

I let others run my sites. I never even look at them. I let them do what they want. It works well it seems. $3.27 v 50cents lol