I am not if this is true or not, not sure how to meassure it
Upvotes within 1 minute of posting a 7 minute read blog like this one is a clear sign.
Downvoting can lead to people feeling discourage and leave and not doing anything can discourage people who have been here a while but not feeling acknowledge.
There will always be people who don't like the change and those who do. And is it really bad to loose a couple of people that are unhappy? If we get new, enthusiastic people in their place. I do think the user retention would improve when we have a better distribution of rewards.
Yeah thats pretty good sign. Could auto-voting represent that people dont wanna upvote a particular post, instead they wanna upvote the users as a whole?
Just trying to speculate here. I dont use auto-voting for my own account and dont look at maximizing my curation apr.
I think so to. And probably would Blurt be a bigger success if downvoting was the big issue.
I think it's often a matter of maximizing curation rewards. Or upvoting posts from friends I think.
Probably. Could one solution be that you can choose then if you wanna vote on posts, but dont have auto voting, or have a other type of vote where you say I wany user x to have my vote. Not sure how that vote value would be calculated or so. But maybe you choose that like once a week or something instead and if you dont check in these votes decay?
Not sure if I make myself clear or not 🧐