It is set as a default beneficiary in the community and also not a requirement to get curated by @lazy-panda.
It was earlier published here to support the project: https://peakd.com/hive-153850/@kronias/an-initiative-to-support-lazy-panda-curation-project
About the voting pattern, the hive learners community follows the lazy-panda curation account to support authors in the community.
I am not a handler of the account and don't control the voting pattern of the account. As I moderator, we only select quality post for curation regardless if it gives back 10% or not.
You think we are stupid?
Definitely not.. sorry if this might have felt this way.
I will disagree and remove all rewards
Okay, then we stop the 10% default beneficiary (even though it is voluntarily) but I plea you think about the authors who spent time creating those contents. They would be affected as well if this be done as well as other curators from outside the community.
I hope you consider my request..
I do not plan on removing rewards from authors. I will remove rewards from automated list of daily curation. I will do that regardless as long as there is a vote from lazy-panda account
Sorry, do you mean the post published with @auto-moderation account?
Bro, he mean, don't vote for your own shit with your own curation account on automatic genereted posts.
Noted..