RE: Please use the HBIT command alone to mine Hivebits

[happyme]

What nonsense! We can only use the command ONCE per day anyway, so abuse is impossible! And it was designed to be farmed for oneself. Later, a tenth was given to the person who's post it was called on, so... what are you talking about when you say it was for giving with purpose as something special?

Hive is already slow as molasses. To have to wait while each independent post goes up is just plain torture.

Comments

[crrdlx]

Hi there @happyme, a couple of things:

• I agree that HBIT abuse isn't possible with the one per day rule.
• You can easily avoid the tenth to the other person by replying to own of your own comments. Some people (me included) have made their own "my HBIT mine" post and reply to it each day or whenever.
• As to the speed issue, using the HBIT command over and over won't go through, but it does force the bot to cycle through things which is wasteful.
• As to the "something special" comment, I meant that more for LUV than HBIT. I could have phrased that better here.
• The image shows the kind of thing trying to be avoided.

I appreciate your thoughts and I'd say hang in there, I'm still thinking.

!LUV

[happyme]

Thank-you for the response.
In the image, you showed someone using multiple commands.
Each command is for a different token. That means the poster has bought/staked/saved for each of those tokens in order to use the commands. What is wrong with that? Isn't the idea of a token for people to collect and USE them? Isn't that what the issuer wants? Do you expect that people should sell all but ONE token and use JUST THAT ONE?

Honestly, I really don't get this whole idea of having to post each command on its own. Instead of encouraging the use of these tokens, it discourages their use, and that seems counter-productive to me. That would be like telling everyone NOT to use HIVE and just stick with BTC.

These tokens need to be USED to be seen and adopted by others. Otherwise, why issue the token in the first place? AND even more important is the fact that these tokens can be altered after they have been issued! What kind of 'contract' do we have where the issuer can unilaterally change the contract at will? How can anyone have trust in a token that can be altered any time after it has been issued? That goes against all the principals of immutability and blockchains in general.

[luvshares]

@happyme, @crrdlx_(2/4) sent you LUV. wallet | market | tools | discord | community | daily

⚠ The LUV command will soon require that no other "!" commands accompany it. Details here.