I don't know if you are aware of this book, it is a fictionalized version of this one.
This one flows from the second.
What you have to ask yourself is why these economics are not taught in state run economic indoctrination centers.
The only option on the table seems to be the one I keep hearing from folks over and over.
Not once have I heard these ideas outside select areas of each country I have been in.
I figure that plays into the matrix of control design.
Don't teach the slaves to read.
The ones that do read can be distracted with whatever narrative publishers push.
That these books ever made it into print in the first place is telling of the importance of a free press and free flow of ideas.
Having read those, and more, I can't fathom why folks continue to put up with this crap as presented to them.
As long as it's voluntary, I guess.
Absolutely, until lenin made marx famous by killing 20+million people in the ukraine for being anarchists, communism was about peaceful cooperation.
The historical record is very clear about the divisions, if you take the time to read them.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/franz-mehring-the-bakunin-marx-split-in-the-1st-international
Sure, but what I mean is, let's say we currently live in a marxist society engaged in peaceful cooperation. Then, one day, I decided to start saving some of the resources I have in a secret stash and I also encourage others to do the same. Is this against peaceful cooperation?
I don't know much about marxism, haven't read him.
I came at communism through Bakunin and Kropotkin.
So, if you are asking if someone piles up a hundred cars in his secret stash, I'm sure that his neighbors might look askance at him, but he isn't hurting anybody, and when he dies the cars persist.
In an environment where you get what you ask for, when available, rather than a scarcity mindset, hoarding would be frowned upon, but not a serious issue.
You'll have to flesh that out a little if you want more.
This short story makes an effective an-crap outline.
So that's interesting to me. He isn't hurting anybody by hoarding resources and this wealth would be released when he dies. It seems like his actions would be discouraged, even by calling it "hoarding" and frowning upon it, but otherwise, it's ok.
If he also has freedom of association and therefore decides to ramp up his store of wealth by creating contracts, building a secure facility, and hiring protection forces that he pays for from promissory notes secured by his stored resources, is that ok too?
Yes, but what is wrong in the general population that makes the fella defensive like that?
Nobody robs in a world where talent is the passage way to fulfillment, and nobody is denied based on its absence.
It is up to the system to find each his place, yes?
Proper management decrees it?
Why would you want to secede from a working federation?
One that lacks the impetus to control others.
You see what I'm doing, right? I'm describing a capitalist who finds himself in a peaceful, socialist society. He decides to store resources and protect them for his own purposes.
He pools his own resources, as well as anyone else's resources if they decide to buy in, and they save them for the future so that one day, they can decide to release those resources however they wish. And that might mean they pass them along to the next generation, complete with its own protection system already in place.
The next generation might decide to liquidate it or expand the system was originally designed. But at no point has anyone violated anyone's individual rights.
Inside this system, some people have more ownership than other people. It is unequal, in terms of ownership, primarily due to when people joined as well as other factors. But because they are voluntarily part of this system, they don't worry too much about this unequal distribution.