yes, it's a shame. if i was you I would cry and bite my elbows. but for me the situation is clear, as for a curator. there is nothing personal against you here, this interaction with Trafalgar is an attempt to fix / adjust his curation efforts on blockchain in a more cultural, useful framework, -- more small upvotes, instead of 10 one hundred percent blindly upvotes... you dont see everything behind the curtain, the indirect things.. theres a lot bad un-obvious consequences for the blockchain from this pattern. ehehe.
yes, it's a shame. if i was you I would cry and bite my elbows. but for me the situation is clear, as for a curator. there is nothing personal against you here, this interaction with Trafalgar is an attempt to fix / adjust his curation efforts on blockchain in a more cultural, useful framework, -- more small upvotes, instead of 10 one hundred percent blindly upvotes... you dont see everything behind the curtain, the indirect things.. theres a lot bad un-obvious consequences for the blockchain from this pattern. ehehe.
Got it, but I have no influence on how Trafalgar, Hajejin or Ranchorelaxo vote
ofc. nobody of us has... thats the reason behind OCD downvotes - it is a measure to influence and suggest for a talk.