Not for nothing, but the fact that they called themselves National Socialists (Nazis) has nothing to do with the political spectrum that Hitler actually managed, his party was extreme right-wing, you can check this on Wikipedia itself.
The fact that the two governments are similar is perhaps due more to the fact that they are both totalitarian dictatorships.
No. It's not like that. Many describe Nazism as a right-wing model, but in reality it is left-wing (here the confusion is due to the theory of nationalism).
State intervention, barriers to entry, expropriation, limitation of property rights and the printing of inorganic money are policies of only one ideological tendency. What is said is not the same as the behavior of the statist model. Therefore, the model itself should be studied and not the description of the press or some positions in web pages OR governments. Although reading different positions allows to form a good criterion.
An emblematic phrase of the tyrant in his immortalized thoughts states the following: "The collective takes precedence over the individual".
This being considered everything, a bad mutant of the capitalist model: Marx, the social democrats and communists who wanted to take over the earth; although his public was the proletariat. He believed himself to be the representative model of intervention and the true Welfare State.
To cite an example, in Venezuela the Social Democrats and Social Christians are called right-wing parties when they are moderate leftists.
That they are regimes is not the only similarity. There is much more, for example, expansionism, media management and cultural crushing through the substitution of the homeland, which in general terms is everything and is nothing.