Part 3/4:
Marcelo reiterated that the violation was indeed a red card offense, indicating a clear and significant infringement of the rules that disrupted a promising goal-scoring opportunity. The discourse also reflected how the rules differentiate between a yellow and red card – highlighting that the severity of the foul justified a higher sanction in this instance.
Conclusion: The Final Decision
Ultimately, the decision was reached and communicated confidently: a red card was to be issued to the foul-making player. The ruling emphasized the clarity of the foul location, the nature of the challenge, and the attacker’s clear path to scoring. Marcelo confirmed that the application of the red card was well justified, reinforcing the importance of stringent enforcement of the game's laws.