Part 3/7:
In the days immediately following 9/11, explosives expert Van Romero posited that the towers’ destruction seemed more akin to a controlled demolition requiring explosives—theories bolstered by the unique nature of the collapse. However, mere days later, Romero reversed his stance, suggesting that fires were indeed responsible. This sudden change raised eyebrows, particularly in conspiracy theory circles, leading to allegations that he had been influenced or even paid off after receiving $80 million in grant money from the government. Some noted that prior to the attacks, Romero had taught courses related to energy weapons, suggesting he might have had relevant insights.