You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-03-28 13:38

in LeoFinance7 months ago

Part 7/8:

One of the key points highlighted is the nature of the destruction of the Twin Towers. The buildings’ collapse is framed as a mischaracterization; the argument made is that rather than crumbling into debris, they disintegrated into dust midair. Further supporting this claim is an appeal to the absence of expected debris and seismic readings that would indicate a collapse consistent with the buildings' size, emphasizing that much smaller seismic signals were recorded by geophysical instruments at the time. Furthermore, the structural implications of the buildings’ collapse on the surrounding infrastructure are called into question, particularly the so-called "bathtub" that holds back the Hudson River, suggesting that such a collapse would have breached that protective structure.