Part 3/9:
One of the notable whistleblower cases relevant to this discourse is that of Professor Morgan Reynolds, who, in 2007, filed a complaint against the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He alleged scientific fraud regarding the impact studies related to the World Trade Center collapses. Advocates for 9/11 truth point to Reynolds' claims as evidence of larger deception, suggesting that shortcomings in accepted scientific analyses warrant a reevaluation of the consensus narrative.