Part 4/7:
Wood highlights the presence of molten metal at ground zero and unusual effects on cars that were left undamaged or “toasted” without any apparent heat source. Her interpretation of this evidence suggests that a high-energy event occurred, causing materials to behave differently than expected under conventional theories about heat and physics.
The Evidence and Criticisms
Critics of Wood’s theories argue that her ideas lack scientific validation and often rely on anecdotal evidence. The mainstream scientific community maintains that there is no credible evidence to support the existence of directed energy weapons used on 9/11. Instead, they argue that results from NIST's investigations provide sufficient evidence explaining the collapse.