Part 6/7:
Cognitive dissonance plays a significant role in how individuals engage with conflicting narratives surrounding 9/11. Many people find it challenging to reconcile their beliefs with evidence that contradicts their existing views. As discussions turn increasingly emotional, logical reasoning often takes a backseat, making it difficult for some to engage with scientific evidence critically.
The Impact of Framing and Terminology
The way information is presented significantly influences public perception. Terms like "theory" and "evidence" carry different connotations and can lead to misunderstandings. Critics often frame Wood's work as lacking scientific rigor by labeling it a "theory," while Wood argues that her findings are rooted in demonstrable evidence.