Part 5/9:
Skeptics argue that the official narrative provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) fails to adequately explain the sudden and symmetrical collapse of WTC 7, attributing it solely to office fires while many contend that such a collapse would be impossible without additional factors, specifically a controlled demolition.
Questioning the Official Narrative
Over the years, several studies and reports have questioned the conclusions drawn by NIST regarding the collapse of WTC 7. A notable investigation, conducted by the University of Alaska Fairbanks, scrutinizes the relationship between isolated office fires and structural failure. The report's findings challenge the official explanation, describing the collapse as "bogus" and lacking a scientific basis.