Part 7/10:
The back-and-forth continues, highlighting the differences in their methodology and willingness to accept or challenge certain aspects of the evidence. As they grapple with terms like "dustification" and "evaporation," the conversation exposes underlying scientific uncertainties—the energy involved in demolishing a structure of such magnitude is vast, yet the theories around it often lack empirical grounding.
This skepticism extends beyond mere technicalities; it illustrates a broader societal dichotomy where the official narrative often clashes with alternative theories that strive for recognition. The interviewer’s persistence reveals the difficulty in establishing common ground when central premises are disputed.