Part 2/6:
The speaker begins with a clear dismissal of Jeremy’s intelligence, suggesting that his academic background, which he uses to claim superiority, hasn't led him to tangible accomplishments. They express frustration at Jeremy's attempts to showcase his credentials while simultaneously soliciting validation from the public. This duality is characterized by Jeremy's contradictory positions—advocating for complex scientific theories yet also embracing fringe conspiracy narratives.
The speaker takes issue with Jeremy's patronizing attitude, indicating that the questions directed at him are both accessible and pertinent. They argue that one cannot proclaim to possess extensive knowledge while simultaneously ignoring fundamental scientific inquiries.