Part 4/9:
Critics also argue that claims made regarding the dust and the lack of high heat cannot solely be attributed to thermite. They suggest that the observed phenomena could be explained through more conventional mechanisms, such as the effects of fire and the dynamics of structural collapse. They highlight laboratory studies and expert opinions that claim the collapse's nature aligns with the laws of physics, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established scientific principles: if a theory contradicts empirical evidence, it must be considered incorrect.