Part 6/7:
The conversation becomes increasingly complex with the insight that many individuals form their theories around preconceived notions. As they seek supporting evidence for their leading theories—such as the use of thermite or explosives—they may overlook vital evidence that contradicts their assumptions. This cherry-picking of data ultimately clouds scientific inquiry and prevents the unraveling of the genuine causes behind the events of 9/11.
The critique extends toward the methodologies of investigation, stressing that resolution must stem from the collection and analysis of data rather than theories. If people do not first recognize what truly happened on September 11, they risk concluding with fundamentally flawed understandings of subsequent events and impacts.