Part 6/7:
In a stark example of censorship, the author recounts a personal experience with an associated website where they attempted to share Dr. Wood’s insights, only to be met with derision and personal attacks instead of an academic response. This incident exemplifies a broader pattern: critical voices are drowned out in favor of maintaining a certain narrative.
Conclusion: A Cycle of Disinformation
Ultimately, the Toronto hearings may serve as another chapter in the extensive saga of 9/11 truth-seeking, marked by selective listening and deliberate exclusion of dissenting voices. The optimism surrounding the inquiry into one of the most catastrophic events in American history may be misplaced if the proceedings continue to prioritize popular agreement over truth and substantive evidence.