Part 6/8:
What is increasingly concerning is how organizations like the International Center for 911 Justice have rebranded themselves in a way that promotes a specific narrative—one that does not engage with evidence counter to their claims.
Their leadership seems to have positioned themselves as gatekeepers of the narrative surrounding flight paths, steering discussions predominantly toward remote-controlled scenarios—which I contend lack empirical backing. Moreover, this self-appointed authority seems to disregard vital evidence that contradicts the widely accepted narrative surrounding Flight 77.