Part 7/11:
Countering claims of nanostructures' presence, Dr. Anna Ulrick, a German biochemist, stated that what was observed were merely proteins and minor impurities present in the vaccine. This assertion, however, led to rebuttal from Finnish biologist Tamara Tuminem, who stressed that a definitive conclusion about the safety of these nanoparticles could not be reasonably drawn without further investigation.
Subsequently, a direct response from Milly and Broodi rigorously disputed Ulrick's claims, arguing that significant evidence supporting the potential presence of nanotechnology in vaccines had been systematically ignored. They called for joint efforts to investigate the emerging concerns rather than dismissing them outright.